Current
Earlier
Later
Archive
Home
Search
Mail
Stuff
Bigger! |
2004.01.18 : 2004.01.24
Saturday, January 24, 2004
Blab. A reader asks us to ...
Tell us your stories about
Captain Kangaroo. I remember him so fondly. And Mr. Greenjeans
and that funny bunny. What was his name?
So sad to lose him today. I
am sad.
Instead, we celebrate finding, at long last, the Banana
Man on the Web, including his haunting song and him "playing" the clarinet.
Some long-unused neurons of ours fired off in resonance.
And that is, we think, about as good as one can hope. There is no eternal
permanence in the universe. We all die. Everything rusts. Gene lines fade
way. Stars go out. Heat death.
But, if you can be remembered, perhaps you have some small, temporary
place in it all.
Blab. A spammist writes:
Subj: Need to host child
porn, illegal content, Spam advert site
Need to host child porn, illegal content,
Spam advert site? Try [URL deleted] you will be able to host anything you
desire. [...]
Our site will be usefull for the those
who want to wash their money also :) (If you don't want to pay taxes or
you need to buy something illegal like weapons or drugs).
How unlikely! We wonder what it's really about.
Blab. A wacky Christian advertises ...
Wacky
Christian Shirts:
You can get this
one for just under 17 Golden Calves (unintentional irony include free
of charge).
Perfect for both Christians and nerds.
Newly hatched chick
commands you to stop abortion.
And so on, and so forth...
Somehow, we don't see this becoming a fashion trend. At least, not around
these parts.
Blab. A reader suggests a ...
possible helenism from
my music teacher-
blink of a gnats eye
ok, so google does recognise it but
i'm sure its wrong
We got in the blink of an eye. We're not sure about the other constituent
phrase, though. Google has lots of references to gnat's
eye. Is it smaller than a gnat's eye? Tell
us.
Blab. A surprise meme mixer produces a masterpiece.
Transcript of recent presidential
remarks in a Chinese restaurant.
THE
PRESIDENT: I need some scary fun fun.
Q: Mr. President, how are you?
THE PRESIDENT: I'm hungry and I'm
going to order some scary fun fun.
Q: What would you like?
THE PRESIDENT: Whatever you think
I'd like.
We are extremely impressed with this! And, it's scary fun fun.
Plurp. You remember, of course, all those breathless stories
about spies in Guantanamo that were plastered all over the headlines last
summer. You know - translators who were about to be charged with mutiny,
sedition, espionage, spying and aiding the enemy -- crimes that could lead
to their execution.
But maybe you missed this.
Guantanamo Spy Cases Evaporate
[...] [A]uthorities never charged
him with any of those offenses. Instead, Yee will face much less serious
charges, such as mishandling classified materials and adultery. [...]
Some experts on military law and the
men's lawyers say the prosecutions of Yee and Halabi have been riddled
with inconsistencies and oddities that cast doubt on the government's original
fears that a spy ring was operating in the high-security prison for alleged
al Qaeda and Taliban fighters.
"I find it difficult to believe professional
prosecutors are proceeding with these two cases in this manner," said Gary
D. Solis, a former Marine Corps prosecutor who teaches the law of war at
Georgetown University. "The ineptitude at each step of the proceeding is
amazing. . . . It seems there's been investigative overreaction in both
cases."
Kinda like those Iraqi
WMD, eh?
Yow. The Department of Fatherland Security unveils a new, more
reassuring advisory system.

We're currently in Bert.
Plurp. We definitely recommend The Boy From Oz, a musical
biography of Peter Allen so energetic and involving that the audience rose
in a standing ovation at the end of a musical number, then again some time
later at the end of the show.
We do, however, admit to a certain amount of confusion as to how there
got to be two completely different actors named Hugh Jackman.

Plurp.
The blue dog
really liked that new
security advisory system
Friday, January 23, 2004
Blab. A person in our group at work writes:
Oh, right. Computer-related classes that you take while on a cruise ship
going to exotic destinations? You can, for instance, take their Linux
Lunacy class while cruising around:
-
Italy
-
Turkey
-
Greece, or
-
Croatia.
They even tell you how to talk
your boss into this boondoggle.
So, to everyone in our group at work: no. (But, you know, nice
try.)
Blab. Inspired by Experiment
2, a reader takes the week off from work to write a book, and then
send it to us.
soap is a molecule that requires
water to mediate the molecular binding forces. too little or two much water
and no bubble will occur. in
the low water or middle ground it is likely that most of the water is participating
in the binding actions. ice forms when water molecules organize. which
means that you would need a mixture that contains a tolerable excess of
water so there are free water molecules that can freeze. but the freezing
would have to be very rapid as the ice crystals would cause voids in the
surface of the bubble leading to its collapse. thus if you took a water-rich
mixture of soap and water, blew a bubble, and let it drift into a liquid
nitrogen vapor cloud you'd likely find freezing and cracking. check on
aisle 32 of the 801 building. methinks they have liquid nitrogen.
in fact, if you froze such bubbles
sufficiently fast you would have two things. first, you'd have a novel
way of creating thin films for study (the soap mixture could carry other
molecules). second,
you could freeze the bubbles in their sphere-form and use them as an insulation
material. if the bubble mixture contained molecules that formed long chains
at low temps you could create very large, low temp bucky-ball structures.
if the long-chain molecules were stable at higher temps you could slowly
raise the temp (destroying the bubble) and leave a 3-d space structure
of the desired molecule. even better is that soap will form a minimum energy
surface (Boys, "Soap Bubbles") which means that you can force the 3-d structures
to multiple, non-sphere shapes.
yet more interesting is that you could
take these "frozen 3-d structures" and use them in manufacturing. if
the molecule you dissolve will form space structures you could build an
array of frozen soap-like hemispheres, deposit the materials on the space
structures and then dissolve the space structures leaving the molecules
as domes. if you build a transistor on the top of the dome it is isolated
from the substrate which reduces leakage into the substrate and also improve
the cooling. and 3-d structures can be stacked.
and you could use the minimum memory
property of a soap bubble to create shortest-path hops between area of
a chip. wiring takes up a large portion of the chip. if
i can build a lattice over a chip, hang a soap bubble structure strung
thru the lattice, freeze it, deposit wires on it, and then remove the bubble-surface
then i have a way of stringing wires (from tiny telephone poles :-)) above
the chip area. this increases the available chip area, makes packing the
transistor layouts easier, and reduces the impedence of the wires leading
to a faster circuit.
you could also use the technique to
form parabolic surfaces. if you make an array of these parabolas you could
put them behind light-emitting transistors. so imagine a parabola with
3 leds "hanging" near the focal point. modulating the light from the 3
transistors would give you a "single" led that can go from white to black.
there is also a technique for creating
"single molecule layer" films (Langmuir-Blodgett films). the trick is to
create a single layer of a molecule on a wet surface and then "lift" a
piece of material thru the layer. as you slowly lift it a single layer
of the molecule will walk up the meniscus and deposit on the lifted material
forming a single layer surface. (i
was using this technique to create rewriteable paper.) if you form 3-d
frozen Boys mimimum energy surfaces you could deposit the film on a film.
if you deposit a molecule that changes shape when a voltage is applied
you could create a super-thin 3-d "speaker" that you couldn't see but you
could hear. (remember the floating "bit" from the film Tron? answer yes
or no.) in fact, the soap bubbles themselves are probably slightly reactive
to an electrical field and you could make a "speaker" that uses resonating
bubbles to create the sound.
electricity travels on the surface
of a conductor. if you create "foam wires" you have a much lighter substance
that could still carry electricity.
you
could get rid of that pesky snow rather more efficiently if you used bubbles
to spread a salt or calcium chloride mixture (rather than chunks of salt
which have very low surface to volume ratios). you said that the bubble
collapsed and turned into a rubbery substance. large surface area and low
volume.
(umm, like i gotta get back to work.
can't be wasting time on such useless activities as freezing soap bubbles.)
Dorian, the boy in the intellectual
bubble.
We have got to get you together with our Midwest Correspondent, in whose
environs these would be normal manufacturing methods.
Blab. Another reader continues the conversation whose subject
is still unknown.
The Loli Exclusion Principle!
I Have noc le either except to suggest
that you ask the GNE player Loli.
OK, Loli. Consider yourself asked. (We don't know what you're asked;
nonetheless. This is a very confusing thread!)
Blab. A blind reader writes:
[link]
Transcript of recent presidential remarks.
THE
PRESIDENT: I need some ribs.
Q: Mr. President, how are you?
THE PRESIDENT: I'm hungry and I'm
going to order some ribs.
Q: What would you like?
THE PRESIDENT: Whatever you think
I'd like.
No, we're not kidding. It's on the White House site.
Blab. One of our many groupies writes:
Subj: as reported on TV tonight
OOooooo......."Sting is 52 and still
attracting women around the world."
Excuse me? The sexiest guy around
isn't 52 yet all the hot babes are after him!
STEVE!!!!!! WooHoo!!!
Hot babes are kindly requested to form a double line behind the velvet
ropes and await further instruction.
Blab. Another groupie breaks loose from the crowd and yells out.
i want to get YOUR juices
flowing
Yes, right. Please wait behind the velvet ropes.
Blab. A reader puts the Plurp shell up to its ear and
listens intently.
I hear it's a traditional
Japanese dance. But that's all I hear.
If you listen carefully, you can also hear the faint sounds of the literate,
screaming.
Blab. A reader who has consistently asked us to correct the spelling
in her Plurp contributions writes:
Subj: as seen seen again
Ok, Steve, go back and look at my
email from yesterday again. It was so funnier than you reported.
Check MY spelling. Hell, YOU live here!
Time to take a day off and stay at
home (do I hear cheering from the far north??) so you can actually read
your email properly. And the marquis on the theater.
OK. Here's what our Treasured Reader sent us yesterday.
THE COOLER
MYSTIC RIER
We leave it to you, our other Treasured Readers, to decide which brings
more laughs per second - this version or our spelling-corrected version
from yesterday.
And, BTW, we're giving up on that spelling correction thing. It's become
too complicated.
Blab. A reader sends us some scary fun.
Scary fun spam I just received:
"SCARY
FUN SCARY FUN FUN"
Hey - that is scary fun!
Blab. A reader contributes to our ever-expanding trove
of knowledge.
Heh, heard new helenism;
"Cramp my pitch"
-"Queer the pitch"
-"Cramp my style"
-AJL
Excellent! We thank our oddly-named reader for its sharp ears and generous
nature.
Just realised that the converse
Helenism would be very funny (though isn't there some rule about non spontaneous
ones - if it helps I'll insert it into conversation later)
"Queer my style"
-Queer the pitch
-Cramp my style.
I guess candidates "Queer eye for
the Straight Guy" would qualify to say that.
-AJL
Yes, but they might mean the opposite of its other meaning!
Blab. A reader sends us a ...
[link]
... which, despite its blind appearance, appears instead to be a rare-these-days
Mia
sighting!
We wish her well.
Blab. Plurp's own ASCII artist sends greetings.
*
*
|
|
|\_._._/|
|
o o | Der gruene Hund
von Mars just
\
´.` / peed on
a rover. "Sorry NASA,
|`---´|
but that was MY rock."
|
|
|`___´|\_
/|
|\
##
##
At a meeting yesterday, a friend said that he had just seen the Rover on
Mars
eBay.
Blab. A reader who has not yet been to Mars eBay writes:
It appears that Spirit, the
mars rover, is not communicating because it is trying to solve some sort
of problem locally. It may be rebooting. Experts are divided on the cause
but there are only two hypotheses:
(a) perhaps windows was not the best
choice of software or
(b) the autonomic computing routine
has decided that there has been no need of radio for the whole trip from
earth so the last few days are an anomoly and it has been corrected.
Dorian, the dispirited
Ian has our
favorite theory.
Blab. A reader announces:
The word of the day is: megaphone.
Actually, it's culture
Plurp. Do people really open email with subject lines like this?
Subject: dont be someone
that irritated other the most pains connected digraph
(Other than us, we mean.) We just wouldn't think it'd be a good strategy
for spammers.
Yo. We're looking for funny remixes of Howard Dean's magical
performance in Iowa this week. There are some links on the
MTV site, but they're mostly audio-only, and how boring is that? (Though
note that long-admired Lileks apparently
has his
own entry.) There are also some links here.
Readers are required to send us
pointers to good video remixes of the Great Yowping Yaaargh!
And you need to do it before Dean drops out of the race in complete
embarrassment. So hurry, OK?
Plurp. In a customer meeting yesterday, a colleague got up and
gave a talk that featured the IBM
crypto co-processor. The amusing thing: we were the only one in the
room who knew that we had invented the technology some fifteen years ago.
It was kinda fun.
Yow. In a meeting today, somebody's cell phone went off. BFD,
right? But the cool thing was that his ring tone was, well, a ring tone,
as in the old fashioned bell-with-clapper Bell System black bakelite 1950s
telephone.
Very amusing.
Yow. S&P
now projects IBM's stock a year from now at $121. (It's currently $98.)
We know you don't care, but we do. If this were to happen, some
of our stock options would actually be above water!
Plurp. From a management memo at work today.
Workplace security reviews
were conducted this year with an improvement in the violation rate.
We're doing our part!
Plurp.
The blue dog
turned out to be composed
entirely of trillions of
tiny
Langmuir-Blodgett
Buckyballs
Thursday, January 22, 2004
Blab. A clueless reader writes:
I have no
clue ...
Whoa! Us neither! Readers with adventurous personalities (and no knowledge
of Japanese) are invited to guess
anyway!
Blab. Having been defeated at Takarati, one of our relatives
appears as an avenging angel.
Computer
versions of that damn stick game.
Got seventeen
minutes to kill?
That's our family - undercutting the foundations of religion since time
immemorial.
Blab. On the innate cleverness of the U.S. government, which
is planning to use a computerized voting machines that was deemed insanely
dangerous by the experts whose opinions they asked, a reader writes:
Not only do the facts not
matter but you'll also notice that they plan to use the known-flawed system
for the next federal election. The same is true of touch screen voting
machines. They run M$ Access databases on top of Windows and can be reached
and modified using a modem. There is no paper trail. I can safely predict
that Bush will win the next election by 102% of the national population
count (not just the number of actual voters). After all Saddam won by a
100% vote. Bush must do better. After which presidential term limits will
be repealed. All hail King Bush.
Dorian, the independent
Vote early and often: Use Perl.
Blab. Another reader is sucked into the Great War Between Google
and Vivisimo.
On the other hand, upon googling
on 'thomas woodward "real name"', the first five hits (at least) all tell
us that it was Tom Jones.
Indeed it
does. Google is impressive.
Blab. A reader helps enlighten us on yesterday's confusing reader
contribution.
The Loli Exclusion Principle,
duh!
We still have no idea.
Blab. The mind control lasers are tuned to perfection, as evidenced
by their effect on an NBC News reporter following our publication of Experiment
2 and its associated Second Physics Quiz.
News Flash at 7:54am!
An NBC News reporter in St Paul, MN
just performed the cracking soap bubble experiment on live TV. Foolishly
no one stayed around to see if it worked at -8 degrees. Stupid news
reporter. I thought perhaps he was a Plurp reader. Maybe he
will show his work here today.
Maybe he will.
Blab. An NBC News reporter writes:
Clearly true. The proof:
"A very-high-temperature regime, in
which the substance cannot support a bubble at all." This corresponds
to the planet Mercury and the essence saffron. In this regime, hope
cannot be sustained, and events follow each other with no pattern.
But life is as common as death. This is the Summer King, the sense
of "information" in which random noise is high in information.
"A high-temperature regime in which
it can support a bubble, and in which penetrating the substance causes
it to pop catastrophically." This corresponds to the planet Venus,
and the Goddess Aphrodite. Life prospers, and popular movements only
serve to confirm the authority of the King. When change comes, it
comes suddenly. The order of words is important, but fluid.
"An intermediate-temperature regime
in which the substance is rubbery, and in which penetrating it causes neither
catastrophic popping nor cracking." Here is stubbornness and unreason,
the influence of the planet Neptune. "Rubbery" encodes "massive",
encodes "unyeilding".
"A low-temperature regime in which
the substance is brittle, and penetrating it causes cracks, which propagate
within the material." Denying change makes change inevitable.
Death comes as the end. This is the Winter King, the regime in which
the blank slate contains no information. The ruling essence
is thyme, the ruling orb the Moon.
We are impressed with reporters in the Frozen North as this is exactly
right. And here we didn't figure that anyone would even step up to the
challenge, much less get the right answer.
Blab. The shady minions of unnamed government agencies that monitor
our every move taunt us with what we see every day on the marquee of the
theater in our neighborhood.
THE COOLER
MYSTIC RIVER
This is, in our humble opinion, just a touch less funny than the version
that preceded it:
BAD SANTA
THE COOLER
We're going to have to find out if whoever obtains movies for the theater
really does have a subtle sense of humor.
Plurp. Meetings at work are so much fun!
Pick up the flag and run
with it
-
Pick up the ball and run with it
-
Capture the flag
And ...
I want to get your juices
thinking
-
I want to get your juices flowing
-
I want to get you thinking
On the other hand, ...
The market is massively narrow
at the bottom.
And ...
As a business, we are very
interested in mold.
No word on fungus. Not yet.
Plurp.
The blue dog
was the Summer King,
the sense of "information" in which
random noise is
high in information.
Wednesday, January 21, 2004
Blab. A member of the tenure committee writes:
Shame on you. Posting your
physics homework on the net for solution.
Professor Dorian
Hey. You have your standards. We have ours.
Blab. A reader asks the fundamental metaphysical question.
Why doesn't food and good
rhyme?
Actually, they do. We blame the public school system.
Blab. A reader helps us out on our our second physics challenge,
telling us how large a trebuchet must be to fling Dubya to Mars.
When your smart readers figure
out how to make the correct sized trebuchet, let us know, so we can set
up a fund to build it.
Thank you for your support. We will take you up on that.
Blab. Who would win in a battle between Google and Vivisimo?
This reader keeps score.
Last week I was trying to
find out which celebrity had started life as Thomas Woodward. Far too many
hits on Google, but one of the subheadings on Vivisimo gave me the answer:
my, my my! Chalk one up for the big V.
How confusing. Who is "my, my my"?
Blab. Of yesterday's addition to the theme song from the Shower
Stall of Progress, the jackbooted thugs who monitor our every action
write:
Yes, it is true. Steve
was caught singing that really stupid song in the shower. I thought
he had lost his mind. Happily, no music came from that same room
this AM. Whew! That was close. We can now crawl out of
the covers.
Of course! Did you think we just made this stuff up? This is our life!
Blab. Morality seeps slowly through the blood-brain barrier.
"No, son, it's
what your father does for a living."
It's about time.
"As scientists of conscience,
we must consider the ethical ramifications of AI development," said Dr.
Gregory Jameson, director of machine epistemology and ontology at MIT.
"The Matrix taught us that we cannot ignore our obligation to the
future of mankind. We must free our minds to this fact, or we will accidentally
unleash a nightmarish army of sentient machines."
Klaatu barada Keanu.
Blab. A reader proposes:
Experiment #2
Last week, right after I performed
the drip experiment, I felt that I was on a real roll. Steve had
already left for work so I needed some sort of entertainment............
Our MW Corespondent once told Steve
and me about how soap bubbles actually crack while floating in the air
when the air temperature gets low enough. Seems to me she said it
had to be markedly below zero. Expecting that'd never happen here
any time prior to the next ice age, I figured I could produce results of
some satisfying type. I first tried to remember where I had put my
little bottle of bubbles. Not recalling that, I went into the kitchen
and poured a small bowl of Joy liquid. I had no little wand, so I
opened up a pair of scissors and used the thumb hole.
Ok,
using full strength Joy got me lots of bubbles that, when they finally
exploded, only produced a mist of tiny drops - no cracks that I could see.
I went back to the drawing board in the kitchen and added a couple of tablespoons
of the Joy to a cup of water. Maybe I needed to thin the solution
out so the water might freeze, thus producing a crack. Back to the
terrace (actually I am no fool - I stood INSIDE!) This time the bubbles
didn't last as long and, when they did pop (ok, this is the exciting stuff!),
all that remained was what appeared to be a rubbery, thin coating that
fell to the snow/ground/ledge and froze instantly on the surface.
I don't know that that substance will ever disappear until the final thaw.
I pointed it out to Steve when he got home from work.
So, no cracks. But some really
weird plastic-y frozen rubber.
This leads to the Second Physics Quiz. Prove or disprove: Any substance
elastic enough to form nearly spherical bubbles has four regimes, which
depend strictly on temperature:
-
A very-high-temperature regime, in which the substance cannot support a
bubble at all.
-
A high-temperature regime in which it can support a bubble, and in which
penetrating the substance causes it to pop catastrophically.
-
An intermediate-temperature regime in which the substance is rubbery, and
in which penetrating it causes neither catastrophic popping nor cracking.
-
A low-temperature regime in which the substance is brittle, and penetrating
it causes cracks, which propagate within the material.
For motivation, note that soap solutions work this way, as does glass.
As always, show your work.
Blab. A reader takes things personally.
One note wonder?? Why I have
posted as many as 5 notes in one visit. I guess that reviewer just has
limited imagination. They prolly just don't understand the references.
Maybe they just can't count?
Blab. In this same vein, a reader who might be Loli writes:
That was a very poor impression
of me someone posted on Monday. They can try, but there can only be one
Loli. It is a law of physics or something.
We have no idea.
Plurp. This last week?
-
helen naked pitures
-
john walker lindh
-
images
-
thermobaric
-
baseball
-
dream
-
imani
-
iris chacon
-
irischacon nude
-
john walker
Right: Helen on top.
Wrong: Anything about Lindh or Chacon. OK?
Yow. We had the best time at work today, spending a couple of
hours with friend Jim
coming up with what just might be the most unbearably clever theoretical
insight we've had in years. We think we have a cool way of understanding
when decentralized vs. centralized control is best in certain classes of
distributed systems.
'Course, we can't actually tell you this clever insight. First,
we have to, like, see if it really works and submit patents and write papers
and stuff.
But we feel certain that you will participate in our cryptic, if uncertain,
glee.
Plop. Two questions. (1) Is online
voting ready for the real world?
Because the danger of successful
large-scale attacks is so great, we reluctantly recommend shutting down
the development of SERVE and not attempting anything like it in the future
until both the Internet and the world's home computer infrastructure have
been fundamentally redesigned, or some other unforeseen security breakthroughs
appear.
So, uh, no.
But (2) do the facts matter?
The Federal Voting Assistance
Program, part of the Defense Department, is moving ahead with the system.
So, uh, no.
Plurp.
The blue dog
was asked to read for the part of
the
soap bubble
in Matrix 4: Byzantine Agreement
Tuesday, January 20, 2004
Blab. Results are back from the physics quiz last Saturday
in which we asked you to explain why a dribble of water on a very cold
window freezes from the bottom up.
In general, we were pleased with the penmanship.
Heat rises. The tops of the
streams are absorbing heat from the bottoms of the streams, allowing them
to avoid freezing longer.
An interesting idea. But the dribble freezes within a second or two. Heat
travels much more slowly than that in water, so there seems to be something
missing still.
Blab. How about this?
"Now observe that the ends
of the streams freeze first, and that the wave of freezing goes up the
streams"
-- those are the parts longest exposed
to the cold.
Possibly, but the process of spraying the water on the window is pretty
fast, and we're not sure that the very first droplets are the ones that
end up at the bottom of the drip.
Blab. A reader has a hunch.
Steve,
I
have a basic "sense" of physics, but don't have actual textbook training
to explain physics in a scientific manner, ergo, I will do my best to explain
the freezing stream of water. It seems to me that not only has the water
at the bottom of the stream been exposed to the elemments longer (granted
a very small measure of time here), but the actual action of rolling down
the glass creates friction, which generates heat (also on a minute level),
which causes evaporation. And, of course, evaporation has a cooling effect.
Just a hunch.
Again, good intuition, but we suspect that the amount of heat generated
by the stream as it slithers down the glass is PFS. (Pretty Freaking Small
- it's a technical term.) And we suspect that any generated heat would
tend to delay the freezing rather than hasten it.
Blab. An eager student writes:
Re: Observe that the ends
of the streams freeze first, and that the wave of freezing goes up the
streams. Explain.
Me! Me! Me!
Here's a theory: When the water hits
the glass and coalesces into streams, it warms up the glass directly under
it (very locally, because glass is a bad conductor). When it runs down,
it cools steadily because warmth is transferred to the glass and the environment.
Now my assumption is that the glass directly under the water (which has
been warmed up by the water) is now warm enough to keep the water from
freezing immediately. Since the water is getting progressively cooler running
down, the glass further down gets warmed up less and therefore cannot keep
the water from freezing as long as the glass further up, which would explain
the observed process.
Recommeded further research:
- Perform the same experiment on
a metal surface. Maybe the water will freeze from top to bottom because
heat spreads faster in metal (I'm not sure about that one, though - the
freezing, not the spreading).
- Take a cross-section of the stream
the moment it freezes (please don't ask me how to do this). My guess is
it freezes from the outside towards the glass surface, because the glass
keeps the water warm.
Very smart S.
We think this is right! The window sucks heat out of the water pretty quickly
(as compared to other effects suggested above), and the water at the bottom
of the stream has contacted (and lost heat to) all of the glass under the
stream.
We haven't tried it on metal, but we'd expect the same result. Metal
conducts heat better than glass, but it's still very slow compared to how
long it takes the drip to, well, drip. We'd expect it to be a less prominent
effect on plastic, as the heat capacity of plastic is a lot less than that
of glass or metal, so the plastic wouldn't cool the water as quickly or
as much.
We suspect that the water closest to the glass freezes first, since
that's where most of the heat transfer out of the stream occurs. Not having
a high-speed camera (or equivalent super powers), we haven't actually looked.
So that was fun, and thanks to all of our participants!
Next: How large a trebuchet is required to fling Dubya to Mars?
Blab. Moving now to the question of what clever thing on this
list sucked up several years of our own pitiful life, a reader makes
a good guess.
re: your clever innovative
thing. I've narrowed it down to either "Token-Ring Networking" or "Scalable
Parallel Systems." How'd I do?
Good, but, we fear, not quite right. We've never been much of a hardware
weenie. Too many atoms.
Blab. A chicken
writes:
has to be the Crypto Cruftyness,
all truly curious enquirers are drawn to the arcane arts of obfustication.
Roger
Correct, despite the obscure reasoning! In fact, we started working on
physically secure cryptographic coprocessors in the mid-80s (very soon
after we came to work at IBM Research) as a solution to the software protection
problem. This morphed into a general purpose crypto co-processor, and resulted
in a string of patents and a FIPS
standard. A
colleague did the hard work to actually get this stuff out as a product.
And the funny thing is: we didn't know anything about the whole area
when we got into it. (This keeps happening to us.)
Blab. A reader takes the nitrous mask away from its face momentarily
to make a wager.
I'll bet it was the IBM 4758
Cryptographic Coprocessor. Hee hee hee hee hee hee.
All too true.
Here's another funny story. When my colleague Steve
Weingart was working on the FIPS
140-1 standard for the security of cryptographic devices, he had a
problem. He needed a way, within the standard, to span a range of security,
from "the box is hard to open" all the way up to "nearly magical technology
for intrusion response".
We had been playing a D&D variant and, of course, writing rules
for it. So we suggested using a table that showed security requirements
increasing with increasing "level" (in standard Gygaxian fashion), and
using qualitative (rather than quantitative) characterizations of each
level.
If you search for "Table 2." here,
you'll see that this is exactly what ended up in the standard. It's a well-kept
secret that it had its origins in D&D.
Blab. A reader who, no doubt, works just down the hall from us
says, with a certain air of authority ...
It is the: IBM 4758 Cryptographic
Coprocessor.
I seem to be turning into a slacker
-- I haven't done any patents for nearly three weeks now!
Get to work! We submitted one more invention disclosure just yesterday,
bringing the one-week total to three.
Blab. A reader with a certain arcane knowledge of produce writes:
Know
ye Kerry won?
Care ye Kerry won? And what did he win, really? We'd rather have a toaster.
Iowa's only interesting quality is that it is first in this little circus.
Other than this bit of PR puffery, Iowa's only reason for existence is
to keep Minnesota from sliding down into Missouri.
Blab. A reader give us ... information.
Google is nice. Ad
infinitum references. Problem is it is not smart enough to organize
the hits in any useful way. Vivisimo is nice. It organizes the hits
into general headins, the kind of thing that used to be known in books
(B O O K S) as indexes. A nice general index. So, you get to
look up George Washington and get subheads re cherry trees, for instance.
(Not true. I made that up. But you do get subheads.) So, instead
of reading 300 entries having to do with GW's piles, dentures, brfeeches,
land acquisition policies, skill at card games, you can focus in on the
things that interest. Thus Google
against Vivisimo.
Imperfect but useful for most searches. I think.
Oooh. Books. We've heard of those! Do you have a good URL?
Yep, Vivisimo looks pretty cool. We should force ourself to use it and
see if we like it. (We did that with spinach but we still hate spinach.
You never know.)
Blab. A helpful reader finds more good dreck for us.
The IMDB entry for H.P. Lovecraft
lists 31 films.
Cool! IMDB is a little wonky. Many of the films on your list don't show
up when we simply search on Lovecraft.
Odd.
Blab.
What's for lunch?
Cow
Brain Sandwiches!
Deep friend cow brain sandwiches at that. Darwin in action, we say.
They would make an excellent Fear Factor ploy, though!
Plurp. Favorite Spam Subject Line O' The Day.
Subj: We can teach you to
make a forfootweartune online...
Plurp. Some recess deep within our subconscious regurgitated
a further lyric of the Shower
Stall of Progress song while we were in the shower this morning. We
figured we'd note it here.

There's a big bright, squeeky
clean tomorrow,
Shining at the end of every day.
There's a big bright, squeeky clean
tomorrow,
Just a bath away!
The plumbing arrives, and that's a
start.
We put in the tub, with mind and
heart,
And when it becomes a reality,
It's a place to bathe, for you and
me.
There's a big bright, squeeky clean
tomorrow,
Shining at the end of every day.
There's a big bright, squeeky clean
tomorrow,
Just a bath away!
Catchy, isn't it?
Plurp.
The blue dog
thought that deep fried cow brain
sandwich stuff
was a terrible idea
Monday, January 19, 2004
Blab. A reader declares, both inclusively and ominously
...
We're famous!
Oh, dear. It's a metafilter thread in which two different contributors
recommend our own, stupid blog as a visit-every-day-for-sure blog. Shoot
-
we don't even visit here every day!
One contributor pigeonholes Plurp as "a bit of a one-note wonder."
Are we? We should probably pack it in, if so.
(Still, we are gleeful at being insulted with
a brand new Helenism.)
This will, no doubt, lead to a temporary spike in the incoming geek population,
followed by a bubble-bursting Cavern of Ignominy to which no one ever visits
again.
It's sad, really.
Blab. A reader confuses us with great familiarity.
Dear Steve, Maybe I missed
this from ages ago, but isn't that a toupee (for reference: top left corner
of this page)?
If you're referring to the top left corner of your email, that was blank,
so you might have forgotten your toupee. If you're referring to the top
left corner of this here page, the answer is: No. If you're referring
to one of the Democratic presidential candidates, the answer is: Probably.
Blab. A reader writes:
Greetings!
I came across your website while doing
some research on neural networks and their use in anti-virus software solutions.
Would it be possible to ask you some questions in regards to your work
in this area of study? Rest assured they are simple and straight to the
point.
Thank you for your time - I eagerly
await your response!
Regards,
Daniel Rodriguez
Greetings! We eagerly await our response too!
Blab. Proving that certain monopolies don't have a sense of humor
is this reader from across the pond.
Rowe
is keeping his sense of humour.
It seems that Mr. Gates has unleashed his snapping lawyers on yet another
Normal Person.
Rowe, a 17-year-old high
school senior and Web designer from Victoria, has angered the software
giant by registering an Internet site with the address www.MikeRoweSoft.com.
How dare Mike register a homonymical site! The nerve! Anyhow, Microsoft
wrote a nastygram to Mike, saying he was infringing on their copyright
(to MikeRoheSoftTM?). Generous Microsoft
offered a gigantic $10 for the site. Mike asked for $10k. Boom. Instant
news.
Still. We think Mike should have sold it to a pr0n site.
Blab. A readers warns us. And you.
The
cats and the ponies are conspiring. Now is the time to panic.
Flee. While you still can.
Blab. There's still time for readers to posit theories about
our
low-temperature physics experiment! In the meantime, we publish some
related snide remarks.
Cold outside there, Steve?
Here's some clever solutions to keep warm if you step out...
Onion
rings contain enough oil to burn for hours.
Ride in comfort on a flaming
horse.
Nuclear
radiation keeps your scalp and ears toasty.
You people really worry us. Have we told you that?
Blab. What's next?
A search engine with a lickable
interface? What's next? Scratch-n-sniff Plurp?
Quite possibly! Stay tuned.
Blab. On that really funny thing from last week, a reader writes:
Q: What's brown and sticks
to your shoe?
A: Plurp! ... Isn't that a
running joke?
Or a cross-training joke. Or a tennis
joke. Or a sports trainer joke.
Blab. A reader ... well, you figure it out.
i talked to oliverbot earlier
today and i asked him how he could understand if he was a computer, he
said how do you know i am a computer, i said you told me you are a computer,
he said what if i told you i was really a person, i said but then you would
be contradicting your self, and he said exactly, then i asked him to define
abstract, he said interseting who told you that, i said no one i want you
to tell me the defintion of abstract, he said That is a rather sweeping
generalization about people. and now i am tired of typing because
i talked to oliver bot for atleast 2 hours and now i am going to use the
restroom and hope that the plurp does not splash back and hit, but what
is plurp, could you tell me. but then if you tell how do i know if i can
believe you or not, and what is blab, why are all the blabs in this website
italicized, i know italicized is spelled incorrectly but spelled is spelled
correctly, which is quite amazing considering that when i speak i do not
say spelled but spelt, which is incorrect english. And it should be obvious
to me that it is incorrect english because i do not speak english but i
speak american because they are 2 different languages and not one in the
same. How is it that you can call thoughts big if they do not take
up space, and what is a thought, is it an idea, if so what is an idea.
what are your feelings on the subject? do you have feelings on the subject,
of course not because feelings are not material items so they cannot be
placed on top of the subject which is also an idea, which means that even
if feelings were material objects they could not be placed on top of the
subject. what is this something that you desire to be told, if it is in
my abilities, which it cannot be because abilities is not a physical object
with the ability to hold space, i will tell you what this something is
that you wish to know. finally i am done to go use the restroom
Good to know.
Blab. A reader becomes Enlightened.
Hmm, Rumsfeld doing the Hokey-Pokey?
You ARE a subversive blogger!
Next: Camp X-Ray!
Yak.
I feel my grey hair growing.
Plurp. We watched Sleepless in Seattle on TV Saturday.
It was sponsored by Ambien.
Plop. This
is why we don't ski. Seriously.
Plurp. Last night's Wildly Incorrect Chinese Fortune Cookie told
us this:
Your secret desire to completely
change your life will manifest.
Which seems unlikely!
Yo.
We Are The Space
Robots
Pak Chooie Unf
We Are Here To Protect You
From The Terrible Secret Of Space
Please Go Stand By The Stairs
We find (the linked thing) both fascinating and very funny. We don't understand
why. Perhaps our Treasured Readers can explain.
Yow. Ooh! And another in our irregular series of Exploding
Head Vids. We'll have to put the whole collection together some time.
Plurp. Just how many H.P. Lovecraft stories (broadly interpreted)
have been made into movies (broadly interpreted)? It turns out that the
answer is thirteen (though - gosh! - there might be lots
more).
-
Beyond
Re-Animator (2003)
-
An
Imperfect Solution: A Tale of the Re-Animator (2003)
-
Dagon
(2001)
-
Nyarlathotep
(2001)
-
In
the Mouth of Madness (2000)
-
Un
siècle d'écrivains: Le cas Howard Phillips Lovecraft
(1998) (TV)
-
Necronomicon
(1994)
-
Lurking
Fear (1994)
-
The
Unnamable II: The Statement of Randolph Carter (1993)
-
Bride
of Re-Animator (1990)
-
The
Unnamable (1988)
-
From
Beyond (1986)
-
Re-Animator
(1985)
Each and every one of them a stinker, we suspect, though we haven't seen
them all. Treasured Readers who have seen any of these that were not stinkers
(the movies, not the readers; we care deeply about your personal hygiene,
of course, but that wasn't what we were referring to) should be sure to
tell
us.
Plurp.
The blue dog
was a bit of a
one-note wonder
Sunday, January 18, 2004
Plurp.

 |