Current
Earlier
Later
Archive
 

Home
Search
Mail
Stuff
 


Type ...
Bigger!
Permanent URL for this week

2003.05.18 : 2003.05.24

Permanent URL for this entry
Saturday, May 24, 2003
Blab. A reader donates some Rush lyrics.
Genetic blends
With uncertain ends
On a fortune hunt that's far too fleet. 
Catchy. Is this connected with the claim that Geddy Lee reads Plurp? And if so, how?

Blab. An avaricious reader writes:

The new Bosch dishwasher is a God send!  I adore it!  I do believe, though, that a new SubZero fridge would be quieter...........(praying that the old RCA fridge would die soon.  It hasn't played records for a really long time!)
We were unaware that Sub-Zero refrigerators could play records.

Blab. We asked a reader if it would seem odd to it if the bubbles in your champagne glass went down instead of up? A reader supplies a classic Zen answer.

Hey, as long as it is champagne, I don't CARE what the bubbles do.  Just keep on pouring!
We are enlightened.

Blab. Our uniquely polite reader tries to help us. It appears that we need more help than is available. As usual.

Sir: Perhaps this will help you. 
This appears to want to link us to a blog on blogger.com, but it doesn't. Instead, it takes us to the main page. Sigh.

Explain !Blab. That same polite reader is intent on helping us. Somehow.

Sir: Look at this. It explains a lot.
We surmise that this is a Rehnquist doll. We're not sure what the question was. For that matter, we're not sure what answer this is.

Blab. After a week of uncontrolled fetishism, a reader enters groupiedom.

I am attrated to you......... 
And we are attrated to you, Dear Reader.

Serving suggestionBlab. A reader suggests certain ... activities.

Sir: Perhaps you could wear your latex suit (superhero suit) when that reader serves raspberries on your stomach.
Maybe we're confused; it has been a confusing week. But we thought the zerber reader was interested in the spandex (which was the superhero suit), not the leather, with no opinion expressed about the latex. Or something like that.

Blab. A reader catches van Dam in a conceptually entropic state.

<< Andries van Dam, a professor of computer science at Brown who has been teaching introductory computer science there since 1965, agreed. "When kids say, 'Is there going to be a job for me when I graduate?' I essentially have to laugh," he said. "That's like saying, 'When Maxwell discovered the rules of electromagnetism, was physics over?' ">>

Well, was it?

Before we get to our reader's question, we'd just like to observe that asking if there are going to be jobs for everybody currently enrolled in a computer science program is nothing like asking if physics was over when Maxwell did his thing. We'd also like to remind Andries that they're called laws in real science (which computer science, of course, is not).

Back to our reader's question. No.

(But lots of people at the time thought that physics was over at that point. After all, they had great theories for mechanics, electromagnetism and gravity. What else was there?)

Blab. A reader threatens us. Or, rather, the blue dog.

If you smash any kittens, the blue dog better watch out.
The blue dog is already smashed.

Plop. We can't decide which item from the Danbury Mint we should add to the Museum of Utter Tastelessness this month: the United We Stand Collector's Plate, or the Twin Towers Commemorative Sculpture.

It's so hard to choose!

Yow.

If you wanna bump it,
Bump it with a trumpet.
Bernadette Peters is (surprisingly, to us) fantastic as Rose in Gypsy. She is energetic, emotionally deep, and completely believable as the intensely driven show business mother who has no life outside of the success of her daughters as stars.

We have seldom seen a Broadway audience rise in instantaneous and certain unison to applaud anyone.  Peters deserves it.

At least as weird is that the score is by Sondheim, and yet it is bereft of his signature dissonance and wild cadence, and the songs can actually be sung. 

Actually, I've always been two dimensional.Plurp.

The blue dog
was
already smashed


Permanent URL for this entry
Friday, May 23, 2003

Blab. A reader tries to drag us back into politics. That might work. Then again ...
....with liberty and justice for all.....unless you have the wrong name
Sadly, our Dear and Treasured Reader neglects to provide us a link, hoping instead that sending us the full text of some article or other is proper netiquette. But that's OK. We provide the link ourself as a service to our Dear and Treasured Reader.
Anissa Khoder, a 46-year-old U.S. citizen who arrived from Lebanon 14 years ago, filed a complaint last Friday with a judicial watchdog. She said Judge William Crosbie repeated her name at her Tarrytown village court appearance and then asked her if she was "a terrorist." Khoder was challenging two parking tickets left on her dashboard within an hour.
Let's help Ms. Khoder by thinking of good, stinging replies for her. How about these?
  • I know you are but what am I?
  • Takes one to know one.
  • I'm surprised at you, Judge. Just because you're an aging white racist, I don't naturally assume you're a Klan leader, do I?
  • Gosh, did I just hear your career end?
Readers are invited to contribute to the cause.

Blab. A reader informs us that ...

Pygmies want U.N. cannibal court
It would seem that some government folks in the Congo have been hunting down and eating pygmies.

There are just so many directions we could go with this, and every single one of them would get us into big trouble. Yikes.

Blab. A generous reader has purchased a present for us.

Happy birthday Steve
This is so nice!
The final working manuscript for Beethoven's Ninth Symphony fetched a staggering £2.1 million ($3.43 million) at a UK auction house Thursday. 
You folks are really great. We'll be sure to post pictures of it when it arrives. Really, that's just so great.

Blab. Plurp's own pony boy writes:

Helen has her own picture at the top of her bit. I never noticed before. Your picture should show your ponytail. Neigh
Plurp is not intended to be a representational art form. Your mileage may vary.

Blab. A reader sends us a tiny, if entirely mysterious, URL.

http://tinyurl.com/c69c
This appears to be a map of someplace, maybe in Japan. But, being monolingual, it's all Greek to us.

Blab. A reader makes an astonishing claim.

Wow! Geddy Lee reads Plurp!
Does he? What makes you think so?

Blab. A reader clarifies the mystery of zerbers.

"Zerbers" are loving raspberries.
Oh! We like raspberries. (Though we've always been concerned that the sp combination in that word felt bad, Mrowras everyone ignores its phonemic nature and refers to it as z. But perhaps that's not relevant here.) We actually like blueberries better, but raspberries are good too.

We're not sure why our Treasured Reader would like to serve these on our belly. That sounds sticky to us. Perhaps a nice Japanese porcelain bowl would suffice?

Blab. Out of the blue, a reader writes:

I am disgusted
Good to know.

Blab. A reader who is Ian writes:

Ow, my eyes! Oh crud, not again... 

Zerbers !

What - you don't like latex?

Blab. The other half of Ian's brain writes:

NAAAAaaaaargh!  Make it stop!

-- inw, on beholding more horror.

Normally, we would chalk this up to Ian being Ian. We note, however, that we received no requests today for photographs of ourself in other materials. Not silk, or wool, or even fiberglass. Nothing.

We conclude that we have, once again, tripped over the line of reader expectations, and fallen into the Abyss of Abysmal Taste, in which we seem to spend most of our life.

Ah, well.

Pest eliminationBlab. A reader informs us that ...

"Today, your favorite yoga position is the "Airplane Crashing Into Kittens."  This is where you stretch out your arms and legs wide and lay on your belly making propellor noises with your lips."
Then smash kittens? Cool.

Do send videos.

Yo. Oh, you mean those Al Qaeda operatives. Why didn't you say so?

Plurp. Oh no! Turns out that it now takes actual work and a certain amount of intelligence to make a living in computer science. Just like it did back in the day of companies that had to make profits and stuff. So what are today's former dot-bomb wannabees doing in the post-bust era?

They're going into advertising.

Yo. Two important new revelations on SARS today from "scientists". One, from the University of Cardiff, says that SARS comes from space. Another, from the University of Hong Kong, says that SARS originated in cats.

From this, it is easy to conclude that cats come from space, as we have suspected for some time.

Plurp. Oh the horror.

Howie Mandel is like some terrible airborne pathogen, lying dormant for years, only to resurface and doom your small intestine. 
As we have suspected for some time.
Permanent link to this entry

Plurp. Cars have ever more computer thingies in them. Computers thingies are notoriously unreliable. We keep hearing stories about cars blue-screening, with nasty consequences. We keep thinking that these are urban legends.

Now this.

We demand that our readers ferret out the facts. Is this bull hockey or god's own truth?

You cannot resist.

Make it stop !Plurp.

Ms. Kherder's pygmy pony boy
went into zerber advertising as
an airborne pathogen.


Permanent URL for this entry
Thursday, May 22, 2003

Blab. A reader digests the complex discussion of implicit and explicit complicity in heinous political systems and produces the following amazing theorem.
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.
We find our Treasured Reader's logic inescapable. We do not object to choice, of course. We like choice.

Blab. Another undeniable logician writes:

It works by having the glass triangular blocks that the water appears to flow up full of water themselves. Bubbles move up the inside of these water-filled bits of glass and water flows down the outside of them, (as well as a little water being pumped up them) so it gives the effect of water flowing uphill.
ChampagneYes, we read that too. What puzzled us was how they kept the bubbles from being swept back down the incline as the water runs down the top of the glass sheet, thus ruining the illusion. The design that they showed seemed flawed that way. There is a solution, though.

Blab. A reader gets confused, then changes the subject.

I don't get how the bubbles under the glassed ramp can give the apparent idea of the water going uphill.  That just doesn't make sense to me.......And what do bubbles have to do with anything, except champagne, of course...... 

Also, how would you trim the grass on the inside without getting the trimmings all over the neat white stones.  Now, THAT'S the real question!

Would it seem odd to you if the bubbles in your champagne glass went down instead of up? Maybe not.

Blab. On the mystery of the woman who thought the U.S. Commander in Chief looked good in a uniform, an insightful reader writes:

The commander in chief has big ears, and little close set eyes. Women attrated to him are either power groupies or are attracted to chimps as well.
In related news:
Chimpanzees are more closely related to people than to gorillas or other monkeys and probably should be included in the human branch of the family tree, a research team says.
So it all makes sense.

Blab. A reader finds the image of us in our superhero outfit strangely compelling.

My eyes!  My eyes!  Arrrrrgh!

-- inw, having just seen the Daredevil image.

Ian tells us that he can't bear to look at our blog for the rest of the week because of this. Too much of a good thing, we suppose.

Blab. That groupie from earlier this week returns.

I wasn't kidding about the screensaver.
Maybe not, but you should have been.

Blab. Another of our groupies ...

Like the latex over the leather. Want to give you zerbers on your belly - mrowr!
What the heck are zerbers? Never mind - what's this about latex? We published a picture of ourself in spandex and (yesterday) in our lovely red leather superhero suit. Now you want latex?

Very well. Anything for our readers. But don't tell anyone, OK? This is getting a bit weird.

Shhh.

Blab. A reader commands us to ...

Give Helen a sidebar!
Is that like a zerber?

Anyhow, she already has an entire section of our Web site to herself, besides appearing with astonishing frequency here as an Honored Guest Blabbist.

Blab. An ambitious reader writes:

I want to sign up for the Helen fan club.
Excellent. The readings are here. The test is tomorrow. Closed book.

Blab. Loli enters this week's contest, Enigmatic Images for Reader Explication with a a doozy.

Oh Billy !
Caption: And so begins little Billy's plot to seduce the school nurse. (I want credit for this one - Loli)
Goodness! We had no idea that little Billy was up to this kind of shenanigan. We'll have to tell his minders.

Yow. Sims 2 is under development. We can't actually make ourself care, but we do note a disturbing confluence: that same Noguchi lamp is in our living room.

Rant. We recently purchased an über-fancy Bosch dishwasher to replace the old clunker that decided it was more fun to piss on the kitchen floor than do the dishes. It's so hard to get good help these days.

The Bosch, advertised as ultra-quiet, has its own annoying habit. When it's done washing the dishes, it beeps, loudly. If you don't leap up, run into the kitchen and turn it off, it beeps again a few minutes later.

(Off? If it's done, why isn't it already off? Given that there is no sensible action for us to take upon the completion of its appointed cycle, what possible purpose could this notification serve?)
We have had a number of sleep-deprived nights as a result of this infernal cycle, waking up with the dim, dreamy memory of electronic summoning only to wonder, fully awake in the dark, what had disturbed our rest.

The Bosch will continue its cycle of announcing its displeasure at your inaction, then lying it wait, forever, as far as we can tell.

It is an appliance that had its own need to annoy, a machine that demands attention just because, perhaps to assure itself that you care more about it than anything else in your life. In short, it is a dishwasher designed by cats.

Plop. You do recall why the U.S. went to war with Iraq?

The Central Intelligence Agency has begun a review to try to determine whether the American intelligence community erred in its prewar assessments of Saddam Hussein's government and Iraq's weapons programs, several officials say. [...]

That could definitely happen.While the United States may still find [evidence of WMD or ties to Al Qaeda in Iraq], some current and former intelligence officials say it is becoming increasingly clear that the C.I.A., Pentagon and other agencies did not know as much about the status of Iraq's weapons programs and its ties to terrorists before the war as was previously believed. 

Next: "Canada".

Plop.

"LifeLog has the potential to become something like 'TIA cubed,'" he said.

Dog suit !  Dog suit !Plurp.

The blue dog
followed the progression of images
with interest


Permanent URL for this entry
Wednesday, May 21, 2003

Blab. A reader interrupts our depression with more bad news. We think.
The site seems to have been beautifully transformed since that trip to SB where all good and tanned persons reside.  Cool.  But we at Homeland Security (we wanted to call it Fatherland Security but some people of East European background residing in these United States protested, and they are one hell of a voting block) want to alert you that there are still enemies among us.  And that's no vLapham matter!!
Hmm. There's a certain ambiguity here. Our Treasured Reader links to a page that changes weekly

Is the reference to the Harper's Weekly Review dated 5/20/03 , in which, it is related, the Wall Street Journal reported that women are sexually attracted to the Commander in Chief? "Hot? SO HOT!!!!! THAT UNIFORM!" said one New York mom. (Though this confuses us, as the Commander in Chief has no uniform. Or is that the point?) 

Or is it to the Harper's Weekly Review dated 5/13/03, in which we learn that "rumors are worse than killing." Well, that's what we heard.

In other news, or maybe this same news, we learn ...

that federal agents had conducted hundreds of bugging and surveillance operations and visited numerous libraries and mosques using new law enforcement tools.
Yes, that new law enforcement tool is known as a reamer. Can you all say reamer? We knew you could.

Blab. A reader masquerades as Helen.

Hmmmmmm.......looks like I am building my own tasty fan club.  Steve, they can reach me at my own email address..............you can hand it out or I will.  But they have to vote in political elections.

Helen

Helen knows better. We would never hand out her email address, lest she be besieged by Evil Spammists.

Blab. A reader sneaks into the mind control lasers and aims them at us.

Not that I want to influence you in any way, but if you do cut off the tail, check out locks of love. They will take your hair and use it to make wigs for kids with leukemia, etc
While we do regard it as a terribly romantic notion that our hair would show up on the head of some bald kid, a closer look at this site reveals a problem.
We accept 10" minimum hair length (tip to tip), not wigs, falls, or synthetic hair
As our hair is entirely synthetic, we are unable to participate. Shucks.

Blab. Dale Chihuly writes:

Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Chihuly R'lyeh wagn'nagl fhtagn!
If we've told you once, we've told you a thousand times: don't type with your mouth full.

Blab. A reader after our own dark heart sends us this.

BRAT!
We deny that we find this both hilarious and interesting advice. We leave it to our readers to judge for themselves the suitability of the policy represented in this lovely little movie to their own social interactions. But we do insist that you watch it.

Blab. Breaking recent records, and perhaps even breaking us out of our morose state, we have three whole entries to this week's part of our contest, Enigmatic Images Requiring Reader Explication!

Explain !
"Now Billy, hold on to Mommy's hands as the Hover Disc levitates us to the Celestial Temple."

"Mommy, will there be puppies in the Celestial Temple?"

"Yes, Billy. There will be puppies."

Hover Disc. Celestial Temple. Puppies. It's just a marvel, isn't it?

Blab. But enough of such comforting thoughts. Here's our second entry.

Sending little Billy off to war....

- Felis Lynx

It's OK, Billy. We've got world opinion behind us.

Blab. Our third entry is, depending upon how you look at it, actually four entries. If that weren't enough, they are all en genre. Extra credit! 

Enigmatic Image Competition entries:

Broken Joke entry:
Mum: Awww, did you hurt yourself falling off your skateboard?
Kid: Yes.

Surrealist entry:
Mum: Kazoo
Kid: Rikikikikikiki

Surrealist exit:
Fish: These oranges are electric
Blue Dog: No, the organs are eclectic

Caption entry:
Mum's first aid kit inexplicably contained a small boy and a skateboard.

-AJL 

We're particularly fond of that last one. We probably can't explain why.

There you are! Three entries (or six, depending upon how you count) on the very first day. This might be enough to stave off our impending suicide for a few more hours. So it's not too late for the rest of you. Enter early and often!

Blab. Our Doublespeak Department sends us this alert.

Name change. Now "Terrorism Information Awareness".
Oh thank heaven! We definitely thought that the term Total Information Awareness was doubleplus ungood marketing, Winston. This is a much better name, and they won't even have to get new monogrammed towels. And they're absolutely not changing what they're doing. That'd be way too much trouble.

Sleep tight.

Blab. A reader attempts to use language.

"From our way of thinking, choosing to participate in the system makes you a party to the outcome, however opprobrious it might be."

True, but isn't choosing to not make a choice in itself a choice? And, by making that choice (to not choose), you are also participating in the system, if only tacitly.

Can one be passive and revolutionary at the same time?

L.

SometimesA born-again relative once suggested that by not going to church, we were affirming the existence of god. We didn't buy the argument then either.

We do think of ourself as trying to be revolutionary in certain ways. But voting or not voting does not seem to us to be the key to being revolutionary.

Can one use passivity in order to effect revolution? Sometimes.

Blab. A reader knows our needs.

oh, now, THIS is what we need! 
Apparently, we need a renewed nuclear weapons program, designed to produce nuclear weapons with explosive power less than that of 10,000 tons of dynamite. (These are described, perversely, as "small".)
The Senate agreed tonight to lift a ban on research and development of smaller nuclear weapons, rejecting Democratic arguments that any step toward such arms could spur other nations to build tactical nuclear weapons of their own.
Thank heavens for our readers. Otherwise, we would have worried about another terrifying arms race.

Plurp. TV commercial.

[A burly white man, around 35, is seen driving a large, polished SUV along a freeway. He takes a sharp right turn.]

[Cut to the SUV driving across a vast, frigid expanse. Snow blows across the flat surface of a frozen lake. The SUV stops. The man looks out, expectantly.]

Zoom, zoom.[There is a loud crunching sound, then another, and another. The ice on the lake opens suddenly and the SUV plummets into the dark, freezing waters.]

Announcer: KataWhen you're tired of off-road vehicles, get an on-road vehicle.

Kid in Suit: Zoom, zoom.

Copyright licensing is available at charitable prices.

SphereYo. Can you design a Escheresque fountain in which water flows entirely uphill? James Dyson can.

Your task is to figure out the most obvious problem with the stated design, figure out how to make it work anyway, and tell us. And yes, we know the answer.
Permanent link to this entry

Plurp. Having attracted the interest of the spandex fetishists among our readership, we now engage in a shameless attempt to attract the interest of the leather fetishists.

Shameless

Plurp. More news from "Canada":

The world's oceans have lost 90 per cent of prized tuna, swordfish and marlin since [50 years ago when] industrialized fishing began, Canadian scientists warned Wednesday. 
We don't mean to seem callous, but so what? The way this evolution thing works is that a species that is well adapted to its ecological niche at any given time will increase its population exponentially. Thus, if all commercial fishing stopped today, we might expect that the fish population would be restored to its 19th century levels in some very small number of years. If, indeed, that's what "we" wanted to do.

After all, each female fish lays thousands of eggs a year. In a stable population, only two grow up to reproduce. There's plenty of opportunity to replenish the population very quickly.

Puppies !Plurp.

The blue dog
inexplicably contained a small boy
and a skateboard.


Permanent URL for this entry
Tuesday, May 20, 2003

Blab. A blameless reader writes:
The ponytail is not my fault. I voted for samauri. Or samurai. Or samuri. Whatever. 
It is the nature of voting systems that anyone who participates in the vote is responsible for the results. If you gainsay, consider the common invective that is directed against us: If you don't vote, you have no right to complain about the result!

We don't vote in political elections, and we complain about the results all the time. How could we do otherwise? Yet most folks have this bizarre idea that our not voting somehow abrogates our right to say anything about the outcome of the vote.

From our way of thinking, choosing to participate in the system makes you a party to the outcome, however opprobrious it might be.

But we do not wish to make you feel badly, Treasured Reader! Far from it. Perhaps we can soften the blow of your implicit complicity by reminding you that we pretty much went through the samurai thing (well, minus the head shaving and blue dying) on our way to our current Aging Hippy Techno Dweeb. Or that samurai was not one of the choices we offered to you, so you should feel particularly creative in your write-in vote. (And we even spelled hippy wrong, sigh.)

Blab. Similarly, a reader insists:

Don't cut off the ponytail! At 12inches it is a masterpiece. i AM prepared to protest 
But we're just talking about a few inches. Are you telling us that size really does matter?

Blab. About our (or, rather, Helen's) superhero suit, one of our kinkier groupies writes:

You are sort of a hottie in that suit. Could you mabe take some more pictures in that suit and make a screensaver for your female readers? 
My! Aren't you the flatterer, though! We had no idea that there were spandex fetishists among our readership, much less female spandex fetishists. We ... uh ...

What? Oh. Sorry. We were lost in the possibilities.

Blab. Another reader, right on topic, asks:

I haven't seen any recent comments from Helen - has she stopped reading too? 
After that previous comment, we sure hope so!

Blab. A reader feigns good wishes.

Glad you did not go to jail. Is there a chance Helen is avaiolable for dating anyway? 
Hey! Knock that stuff off.

Blab. Homer writes:

Mmmmmmmmmm, Helen.
That's exactly how we feel. Now knock that stuff off.

Blab. A sick reader writes:

I still read Plurp! I was just sick the past two weeks, I am sorry if you missed me. I will try to not let it happen again.
We missed you terribly, Dear, Treasured, Anonymous Reader. Please try not to let that happen again.

Blab. A reader insists that we do work on its behalf.

Declining readership? Is this based on an actual website meter? May we see charts and graphs?
But of course. Charts and graphs are here. If you look at site visits that enter on www.stevewhite.org/log/current/index.htm per day in recent months, you'll find the following.
 
Month
Visits/Day
March
144
April
102
May (so far)
96

We believe that counts as declining. Precipitously so. If we were a startup, we'd be looking for a buyer. A really dumb buyer. As it is, we're merely considering suicide.

Blab. A Treasured Reader tries to distract us from slitting our wrists.

We decline your assertion that we are declining, we're just growing old disgracefully.  -AJL
Thanks, and that's quite clever, we suppose, but we just can't take it any more.

Blab. Bolstering our lagging depression, a rather frank reader writes:

Mebbe if u wrote sumthin interestin more pepoles woud show up. 
We're not so sure. It seems like an awfully high bar, and it's never actually worked in the past.

Blab. Another reader notices something interesting written in the New York Times, which probably has more readers than we do.

Only in New York do you get to know your (former) neighbors through the papers. (And I feel really good about the rent we were paying now.) - MS
A good point. Our neighbors could certainly learn way more about us from reading the newspapers than they have by talking to us. Talking to your neighbors is just not a New York thing.

Blab. Speaking of which, a reader clarifies yesterday's discussion of stuff that is or is not in the New York Times.

I was referring more specifically to your Strangelovian insistence that the NYT is a source of Truth. How very silly.
That's quite funny! We think the NYT is a pretty good newspaper, all things considered. Maybe one of the best. But it certainly gets things wrong. Sometimes really, really wrong. (In addition to the NYT's recent, astonishing reporting fraud.)

That's ... not ... what ... I ... said !!!We've been interviewed for more than a few news articles, and have been at a few events that have been written up in other newspaper articles. It is our consistent experience that reporters make mistakes, both of fact and of interpretation. When we are interviewed, we consider it a fantastic success if the reporter gets our main message right, and gets 80% of the other facts right. It is our observation that this is a very high standard, and is seldom met.

It makes us wonder about all of the other articles that we read. But that just feeds into our paranoia, so we try not to think about it.

Blab. Feeding our paranoia, our one polite reader suggests this:

Sir: The aluminum foil beanie protects you from nothing; it controls the mind (e.g. your Patrick Swayze dresm). Or, so I have been told. 
Well, that's what they want you to think, anyway. But you have a good point about that Patrick Swayze dream. Now we're scared.

Blab. A reader exercises its unique talent to divine the internal mental state of Michael Jackson. That's amazing.

I think this is what Michael Jackson is aiming for.

Do you mean the big guy or the little guy? 

Blab. It is indeed Two-For-One day here at Plurp, as a compressive reader demonstrates..

I give you two unrelated things in one.

http://tinyurl.com/c5w6

Well lookee there. It's a very on-topic Reason article on Trusting the Media: Why spin, fraud, and bias are inevitable, but referenced by some wonky (and supposedly more memorable) TinyURL address. Consider, for instance, http://tinyurl.com/c69d.

We cannot imagine that anyone cares about this, but it is kinda cute.

Plurp. Before we pour iodine in the tub and take a bath, we thought we'd show you what people were looking for on our site this past week. Those few people who came here by mistake, that is.

  1. chihuly
  2. imani
  3. helen naked pitures
  4. ian naked pictures
  5. kozer
  6. naked pictures of helen
  7. new jersey does not exist
  8. zyx lady
  9. a mile map for distance
  10. beach
This week's surprise was the ascendancy of the seldom-seen chihuly, for reasons that we can only dimly imagine and greatly fear.

Dimly imagineGreatly fear

Plurp. We've been pretty disappointed in ourself lately. After all, our most recent Plurp contest got all of two responses. (Though they were both wonderful, and we do treasure them.) We figure we're just not being clever enough to capture the imagination of our readers, much less a few scarce seconds of their precious time.

We thought, briefly, about trying to be more clever, but that's clearly beyond our ability. We therefore present yet another incredibly dull, completely uninteresting series of  Enigmatic Images for Reader Explication. As previously, readers with way too much time on their hands should send us their most clever explanation of, or caption for, this touching tableau.

Explain !

Not that we'll be around to publish your responses, of course, but we will admire them in our next life.

Yak. From a talk today about the future of technology.

There's a fine line between vision and hallucination.
Yeah, but our aging eyes probably can't see it.

Back !  Back !Plurp.

The blue dog
wondered
what unleashed this stampede of
user input


Permanent URL for this entry
Monday, May 19, 2003

Blab. A fellow game freak and seeker of eldritch knowledge writes:
At E3, there were "Call of Cthulhu" posters every damn where, so I was understandably a little let down when it turned out Bethesda wasn't even showing the game. Ugh.

Yog-Sothoth!

Kaf

How rude! But we're really glad to hear that they were marketing the heck out of it. That means it might actually appear some day, and be playable and stuff. (We continue to predict that it won't work with the low-end graphics chips that IBM seems to insist putting in their ThinkPads, but that's a different rant.)

Super !Blab. A reader, no doubt doing its homework - and we approve of that - writes:

Wow! You actually do have a ponytail! What a dude!
In fact, our ponytail is currently a bit over twelve inches long. Long-time readers will recall that it's all their fault.

We are thinking of getting it trimmed off a few inches for the very first time since we started growing it, about a year ago.

Blab. A reader has a fashion suggestion for us.

We think you should wear superhero suits all the time. -AJL 
Oh, we do. We were just wearing Helen's superhero suit that day.

Blab. A reader wonders the obvious.

No Helen naked pitures?
But of course there are! In fact, here's another one for you.

Helen naked pitures

Blab. A reader gives us the opportunity to something we love doing. Isn't that nice?

You look particularly foolish now for your "but it's not in the New York Times!" statement. 
Jolly good, 'cause we particularly love looking foolish! We hypothesize that our Dear and Treasured Reader refers to our wondering (in the early days of the Iraqi war) where all those zillions of Iraqi troops had gone, since the "coalition" forces encountered what seemed like a tiny fraction of what Iraq was thought to have.

A(nother?) Dear and Treasured reader claimed, with great fervor, that they had all just gone home as a result of brilliant U.S. psyops, presumably before any of the "coalition" forces ever got there. We noted that we had not heard that interesting theory previously, and suggested to our Dear and Treasured reader that it ought to inform the NYT right away.

D'oh !And apparently that happened, or at least we surmise as much from today's reader's statement. Sadly for us, a quick search of the NYT site for psyops, psychological operations and missing troops turns up nothing, proving once again that we're too stupid to find obvious stuff. Now we now how Dumsfeld must feel about those Iraqi WMD!

But we're sure our Dear and Treasured Reader will send us a link to the relevant NYT article forthwith, so that we can look foolish right here in public.

Yow. Hey! Those infinitely clever people who do the Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie (mentioned yesterday) noticed that we (evil we) included New ! Improved !their marvelously crafted marketroidesque picture of a human(ish) head wearing an Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie as part of our entry yesterday.

Having thus noticed, they had their vast staff quickly whip up a new picture, to which our sluggish blog continues to refer. We like these folks!

Actually, we like the revised picture even better than the original! Buy the book !  Do it now !(Maybe we better put on another layer of aluminum foil.)

Oh, and go buy their book. (There or on Amazon.)

Yo. Desperate to prevent bandwidth theft by image referrers? Not clever enough to put humorous substitutes up on your site? Then here's the tech you need!

Plop. Should it depress us that more people come to our Web site looking for naked pictures of Simonya Popova than to read our stupid blog? Well, they do and it does.

D'oh !Plurp.

The blue dog
had a superhero
birthday suit


Permanent URL for this entry
Sunday, May 18, 2003

Blab. A reader studies actuarial tables and confidently predicts:
you have probably seen this

AFDB

The famous Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie? Why, we wouldn't be who we are today without a liberal supply of them at hand.

Plurp. For those of you who wondered what we were actually doing during our two week absence earlier this month, we present A Series of Uncorrelated Images. We don't expect that it will answer your questions, but it should succeed in confusing you even more.

At least, we hope so.

In any case, yes, this will be on the test. So go study.

And tell us what you think.

Yow. There seems to be an actual release date for Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth. It's June 16, 2003. We'll see, of course, and forgive us for being dubious. But, given the spotty release history of this game, and the fact that it's, you know, software and all, we feel justified in maintaining a certain skepticism.

Still, they even have a publisher this time, so it could happen.

Yow. You can now get authentic roti skins delivered to you, even as far away as New York, part of the growing trend towards On Demand.

But I'm still uncorrelated !Plurp.

The blue dog
just got back from
some dark corner or other
Top Earlier entries Later entries

© 2001-2003 Steve R. White, All Rights Reserved