Current
Earlier
Later
Archive
Home
Search
Mail
Stuff
Bigger! |
2002.07.21 : 2002.07.27
Saturday, July 27, 2002
Blab. Perhaps related to something
else, a reader writes:
Central limit theorem "broken"
09:21 19 July 02
NewScientist.com news service
One of the most fundamental rules
of statistics, the central limit theorem, has for the first time been shown
not to hold for very small datasets.
The demonstration, by gym teachers
in Moldova, involved using a six-sided "die" to pick some random numbers.
They found that once in awhile the die came up the same way three, or even
four, times in a row, revealing nature running "all funny-like".
We cannot comment on this because (a) it would be rude, and (b) we're laughing
too hard.
Blab. Indulging in the now forbidden activity, one of the
noiseless myriads writes:
Densities, growth, facades,
Strata of mountains, soils, rocks,
giant trees,
Far-born, far-dying, living long,
to leave,
Plurps everlasting.
And thee my soul.
Blab. Taking this form to its psychotic limit, a reader writes:
Once upon a weblog Plurpy,
While I pondered, bored and blurry
Over many a quaint and curious
Rant about forgotten lore
While I nodded, nearly dozing,
Suddenly someone came nosing
Over my shoulder and posing
Posing like some ancient bore.
'Tis some manager, I muttered,
Posing like that guy Al Gore.
Blabbed the blab pox, "Never more."
We've already signed the commitment papers.
Blab. Solving our most recent mystery, a reader writes:
Subj: Re: Answering machines,
et alia
Hi Steve,
Thanks! Reading your pages made my
day. (I followed Bruce Sterling's link, if you're interested.)
And I thought my "World's
Most Powerful Metadisclaimer" was funny... serves me well.
Anyway, please keep on doing whatever
makes you write that sort of thing.
And, here's one answering
machine message you haven't used yet: "Hi. I'm an answering machine.
Who are you? <beep>"
--
Rainer
Brockerhoff
Ah. It becomes clear why our foolish little blog has had a few more cyberfeet
tramping mud through lately. Bruce
Sterling went and linked
to us (you'll have to scroll down a bit) amidst links to other people
who were at our Grand Challenges conference
a few weeks ago.
A big howdy to both readers who got here from Bruce's page. And we do
like that disclaimer.
Blab. To keep us whole, a reader provides us with another mystery.
At the bottom, it's all utils.
This seems like it should be an inverse link, doesn't it? But it's
not. Or Helenism, but
it doesn't
seem to be that either. What could it mean?
Readers?
Blab. Noting the recent breakup of Ms. Jolie with her overbitten
husband, a reader writes (or tries to search for):
jolie tattoo
We can't imagine why.
Blab. A reader who has seen things donates this.

We know of several things like this. Leprechauns. Giant squid. Dubya's
intelligence.
And from that same site
...
Plurp. Brazil, with help from the U.S. of course, has finished
construction of the $1.4 billion system of radars and sensors called the
Amazon
Surveillance System.
The system is so sophisticated
and comprehensive that Brazilian officials now boast they can hear a twig
snap anywhere in the Amazon. [...]
The system includes 900 listening
posts scattered on the ground all over the Amazon. But its backbone consists
of 19 radar stations, 5 airborne early-warning jets and 3 remote-sensing
aircraft, all of which will feed information via satellite to command centers
in this Amazon capital and two others, Belém and Pôrto Velho.
[...] From a height of 33,000 feet
and a distance of up to 125 miles, he said, the system can track an image
of something as small as a human being.
This is, you understand, to ...
[...] protect our land borders,
preserve our natural riches and make the state a presence in our most remote
areas.
That latter seems the phrase that pays here.
Is this a good idea? And, if they can do it in a place as remote and
forbidding as the Amazon rain forest, will we see other ambitious states
instrumenting their countrysides in the near future, for their own purposes?
Plurp.
The blue dog
had to be believed
before being heard
Friday, July 26, 2002
Blab. Proving that some readers really do click on our
most obscure links, this reader writes:
why, pray tell, do the blue
dog's links not work this week? And what is their systemic justification,
anyhoo (for I know, just know, that there must be one)?
Our Treasured Reader refers to what happens when you click on the blue
dog. In saner times, doing so took you back to the first entry that featured
the blue dog. This week, it took you to 404 land.
Why? As usual, it's all our fault, but this time we'll blame it on our
stupid WYSI(a)WYG HTML editor. (Heh. Pronounce that!) You see, our
Sunday entry had no blue dog. We don't know why. For the Monday
entry, we had to go scrape up a copy of the blue dog from the archives.
Somehow, in that process, the link to the origin of the blue dog (and should
that be All In Caps?) decided to be a local reference (within the archive:
20001001.htm#20001002)
rather than a relative reference (from the current log directory: ../archive/20001001.htm#20001002).
So for you, our Treasured Reader, it 404ed. Sorry about that. But it
did allow us to tell you this tedious and incredibly boring story. And
for that, we thank you.
It also allowed us to discover a broken link to the progenitor of the
blue dog, and to create a more specific link to the
original blue dog entries. History will thank you.
Blab. A reader finds a shouty, agrammatical Web site that has
a ...
REAL
VIDEO OF UFO AT WTC PRE 911! AMAZING VIDEO SHOT OF UFO AT WORLD TRADE
CENTER PRE 911!
We feel certain that the key word in this breathless announcement is AMAZING.
A better characterization might be INCREDIBLE, but we do like the
zoomy thing.
Blab. On our observation that you can miss rush hour by working
eleven hour days, a reader suggests a generalization.
You can also miss rush hour
both ways by working 8-hour days, but starting and ending them about 1.5
hours later than most people's 8-hour days. This is what I do.
True. One can also miss rush hour by not working. Or so we are told.
Blab. Continuing what appears to be the as yet unannounced contest
in which you are to trivially substitute the word Plurp in a famous
poem, a Mr. Coleridge
writes:
Water, water, everywhere,
And all the boards did shrink;
Water, water, everywhere,
Nor any plurp to drink.
We encourage our Treasured Readers to invest their few remaining mental
abilities elsewhere.
Plurp. Welcome, Herbert
Smith.
Rant. Ya know, when it comes to evolution, ya gotta bet on the
winners.
Take this recent snakehead fish flap. Some
chucklehead who intended to make
soup out of them instead dumped a couple of oppositely-gendered snakehead
fish in a lake. Predictably, some months later, there are lots
of snakehead fish.
There is a group of humans that thinks this is a terrible idea. After
all, they say, the snakehead fish is "non-native".
It was introduced into this environment by humans, and we all know that
humans are Evil, and that anything they do is Evil. If a raccoon had brought
them here, that would have been OK. More natural, you see? Sheesh.
Where do they think all these "local" fauna came from?
These are the same folks, we suspect, who wish to ban other folks from
immigrating to "their" country, or "their" neighborhood. These xenophobes
think that Nature has nicely divided the world into "us" and "them".
So here's a clue for the clueless: Nature hasn't. Species move around.
There are species that are well adapted to their environment and species
that are not. The former do better than the latter. Exponentially. That's
the way it works.
And
here's the important clue: You can't do anything about it. There
are bozos
who propose poisoning this creatures' ("local") environment. That will
decrease the current population of this fish. It won't kill it off. It's
here to stay. Get used to it.
Better
yet, rejoice. What a lovely little fish, we should say.
What
a clever and well-adapted little vertebrate you are. You are a winner,
and we love you.
If we must do something other than leave them alone, let's figure out
how to farm them, how to produce fertilizer from them, how to make them
into building material.
Or sushi. Sushi would be good.
Plop. Speaking of which, world leader Fidel
Castro wonders out loud if capitalism is sustainable. Why does the
term dodo occur to us?
Plurp.
The blue dog
was just glad to again be
linkful
Thursday, July 25, 2002
Blab. A reader has a close encounter of the third kind
with the traditional media.
Seriously I would have expected
news that the sun was going Nova way before I heard this.
This is the weirdist piece of scientific news of the last two centuries
I reckon!
Opens the gateway for.. for... all
those things that many people believe exist but which science seems to
have no room for I would guess. Who built this place? And if it isn't
built how it the seven hells could it have come about by chance? Or by
any mechanism we know anything about at the moment?
OK. Everybody calm down. Some experiments demonstrate a violation of the
Second Law of Thermodynamics ("entropy never decreases") over the scale
of a few microns and a few seconds.
Fine. Thermodynamics (and the Second Law in particular) are macroscopic
laws that deal only with average behavior. There are always fluctuations,
and they can certainly occur on scales larger than we usually see them.
As to the questions in our reader's second paragraph, well, we
built this place. Do you like it?
Blab. Regarding dead babies being the cost
of war, a reader muses:
It's a curious thing that
our language only seems to be able to express concepts of value (another
example) in terms of economic metaphor. We don't seem to have many good,
concise ways of expressing that something is important to us, or that something
hurts us or horrifies us, without reducing everything to goods and services.
Does that say something about us?
I'm curious how other languages and cultures deal with this sort of thing,
whether it's universal or uniquely Western European.
L.
Good question! Readers?
Blab. Walt Whitman
writes:
I sound my barbaric PLURP
over the roofs of the world.
Ah. We wondered what that was.
Plurp.
blether (ble'-thir)
Dialect, chiefly Scot. ~n 1. person who chatters incessantly;
one who babbles on and on ("That wee yin o' yours is an awfy blether
gittin'"). ~v 2. to engage in conversation, long-winded
or idle talk (as in "Ah met yer granny doon the toun, we hud a richt
guid blether the gither") [See also sweetie-wife]
Yo. Well, it finally happened. We just now passed through a singularity
in the evolution of the cosmos. As we were transcribing that blether
thing from a physical artifact on the table here, we went to find a link
to sweetie-wife
on Google only to realize - and it took us several seconds to solve this
puzzle - that we were not online.
Plop. You may have wondered about that
screen image yesterday. We did too. It turns out to be a tribute to
our own stupidity that we only just figured out the reason it was unreadable.
We had told your browser (and ours) to display it at an unrecognizable
resolution.
Sorry about that. Fixed now. Go look.
Plurp. This is rumor control. Here are the facts.
-
If you work 11 hour days, you can pretty much miss rush hour both ways.
-
The traders on the American Stock Exchange have pictures of their kids
at their trading stations.
-
Mold on the inside of a peanut shell is not a good sign. Noticing it only
after you have swallowed the peanut is particularly contraindicated.
-
At night, insects are uncontrollably attracted to laptop screens.
Plop. Did you know that glow
sticks and bottled water are drug paraphernalia? Hey - that's what
the Department of Justice and the Drug Enforcement Agency say. And who
would know better?
Yo. Here's what seems to be
a set of (moderated and unmoderated) discussion lists on the general topic
of the ongoing terrorism conflicts. Allegedly, al-Qaeda
folks post there.
Yow. Sony's planned PlayStation
3 is going to be a BFM!
Plurp. Looks like he's going to be a Tedsicle
after all.
Yak. A lovely term, which we had not heard until today.
Boxology
Yow. We went out tonight to see K19,
the Harrison Ford movie, but, enigmatically, it turned out to be Road
To Perdition, the Tom Hanks movie. And, despite the utter lack
of submarines, the absence of explosions and there not being very much
threat at all of nuclear annihilation, it was pretty good.
So you should go see it, and stuff.
Yo. Princeton
hacks Yale. Don't you kids have homework to do? No? Well, then at least
restrict yourselves to breaking into P2P networks; that'll at least be
legal
soon.
Plurp.
The blue dog
was once detained for
violating the Second Law
Wednesday, July 24, 2002
Blab. It's going to be a day of grisly torture and death
here in Plurp. Those of you who do not delight in such musings should
pretty much skip the whole thing.
For the rest of our treasured readership, we begin with a reader who
sends us a sightless ...
[link]
Right. Is everyone ready? Based on a experiment that showed that women
are a bit better than men at recalling highly evocative photographs that
they've seen previously, and some MRI scans showing different brain activity
between men and women during this task, a "team of psychologists" concludes
that ...
The wiring of emotional experience
and the coding of that experience into memory is much more tightly integrated
in women than in men.
Or, as it is breathlessly soundbitten by the media:
Female Brain Wired for Emotion
Which all seems like a fantastic hypothetical leap to us. We suppose
this means that we never had what it takes to be a "team of psychologists".
Blab. A reader suggests an interesting method for the preparation
of giant squid, then admits to a fetish for mutants.
I know a few cajuns who happen
to have a recipe for giant squid; at least one of whom, depending on your
preferences, would look quite fetching sans apron. Actually, it's been
rumored that it isn't really a squid but the head of Cthulhu.
>re: six siamese kittens
dude, they're commingling their code.
tight integration is all the rage. that's what happens when software slaves
do genetics research. Redundant hardware. If one of the cpus goes down
there are backups. Pro'zly even self-healing. Top o' the line kittens.
Where do I get one? Do they come in ones?
Dorian
We asked about that, and it turns out that it's half
of one, six dozen of the other.
Blab. A reader absolutely insists that we adopt a penguin.
Just as an aside, Slowtus
Notes actually runs pretty well inside WINE on Linux, (or as well as Notes
can ever be expected to run anyway), as do many games. In point of fact
many games run natively on linux also. We suggest that with all the power
of IBM at your disposal, you could get Freelance ported. You'd have to
forgoe the MS patented Virus Spreading Kit though. (Oh, and OpenOffice
is very good at creating MS Office compatible documents / spreadsheets
/ ppts etc). You see, I was once like you (well, not quite as clever maybe)
but I now do everything that I needed to do from the crash free haven of
my Linux machines. Including administration of a large MS based network
for my employers.
-AJL
If only we had all the power of IBM at our disposal, our devious plot to
take over the world would be much further along! (Or maybe
not.)
Blab. Three readers give us improbable answers to our question
about what those little HTML pop-up text goodies are called.
ToolTips (or if you are no
fan of InTerCaps, tool tips). They come in standard and Emo Phillips.
We used to be a fan of Emo Phillips. We wonder if we still are. Nonetheless
...
Quoth Plurp: "Plop. Yeah,
we know the little HTML pop-up text goodies aren't called hover help. But
what are they called?"
Answer: Tool
tips. Or, alternatively, tooltips.
Oh please! There's nothing tooly about them, and they seldom have information
than any sane person would regard as a tip. That just makes no sense.
<IMG SRC="blab.gif" ALT="This
is the popup text">
All syntax, no semantics, eh?
Blab. A reader laments at ...
The
cost of war
It's odd, maybe even macabre, to think of the death of babies as a cost,
isn't it?
Plurp. Whoever decided that hell is below ground and painfully
hot must have been riding a New York subway at the time. As were we, last
night, strangled in a dress shirt and tie (though carrying the required
sports jacket) on the way to the American Stock Exchange.
We lost an extremely large amount of money in the past year or so, as
the stock market collapsed into a smoldering crater. Stay with it,
our broker said, the market always goes down and up.
So our broker, trying to make amends, arranged for us (and a hundred
others) to visit the American Stock Exchange last night and pretend we
were traders. To see how it all worked, we suppose.
The American Stock Exchange started its life in a glorious building,
a tribute to burgeoning capitalism, in which the outcasts from the NYSE
came to trade. Today, its magnificent atrium is divided horizontally into
two floors, those floors being littered with the most disreputable array
of technological junk imaginable. Seven generations of computers
and displays and servers and keyboards, their cables strewn across the
floors and narrow aisles to form the visual chaos of a druggy ub3rh4ck3r's
basement, all surmounted by a ring of booths, spectators in the Coliseum,
at which unknown futures traders call their speculations to the floor,
much as their high-collared progenitors shouted their desires to the street
traders a dozen floors below. It is a scene out of Brazil,
surprisingly random and low tech. Screens everywhere - CRTs, LCDs, touch
screens, reader boards - all cryptic, incredibly obscure, comprehensible
only to the priesthood.
We engaged in a mock trading session in which the market maker, James,
bellowed at us like a drill sergeant. Will the price go up or down?,
he demanded of a portly woman named Dorothy. Dorothy, wide-eyed, her lips
taut across her teeth, didn't know. Up!, he shouted. Up! Are
you buying or selling? Cowed, we bought. Or sold. We're not sure. But
it was loud. And frenetic. We think we lost a lot. We don't really know.
Afterwards, we walked back to the subway past the site of the former
WTC for the first time, not having wanted, really, to expose ourselves
to it since 9-11. We shunned the site itself, not quite crossing the street
to see it, though we could inevitably see the surrounding buildings, wrapped
in netting, or scaffolding, or with their windows still taped in, their
entrances still dug up, collateral damage of that awful day.
And in the sweltering subway on the way back, we dreamed only of going
home, of crawling into the shower, of washing off the taint of that hell,
the dust from that smoldering crater.
Plop. Are you keeping up with current linguistic trends? You
are? Then you already know that the latest term for state-sponsored genocide
is thinning
out. Please use it in conversation today.
Yak. Out of our own
mouth, just yesterday.
Behind the covers
-
Behind the scenes
-
Under the covers
Plurp. As an adolescent, we loved building models. We built incredibly
intricate models of airplanes, submarines, space ships (remember when they
were called space ships?), and so on. But our pride and joy were
models of The Mummy
(the original Boris Karloff version) and The
Wolfman (not the DJ), over which we obsessed for hours, mixing paints,
using sand and other goodies to add texture to the surfaces.
We liked monsters. Monsters played a big role in our childhood. For
some reason, this deeply worried our parental units. The monster models,
or perhaps our fascination with them, was particularly worrisome. At length,
they forbade us from acquiring any more monster models, hoping to stave
off any incipient psychotic effect they might induce.
Obviously, that didn't work.
Now imagine what the parental units would have said if Clive
Barker's Tortured Souls Action Figures had been around when we were
ten years old. (Kafkaesque)

Oh, and if that grossed you out, you should definitely not look
at the next series in production. Really.
The Gigers,
though, are pretty cool.
Plurp. The hunt for Osama bin Laden has gone into cyberspace,
according to the
Old Media.
Counterterrorism experts
are monitoring a number of Web sites and computer servers they believe
might contain recent messages from bin Laden.
Al Qaeda is said to be computer savvy,
and some investigators believe they have found markers or code words that
indicate bin Laden is trying to signal supporters that he is alive.
Just to make sure, to make sure that we are not suspected of involvement
in terrorism, or associated with someone whose name has letters in common
with someone who might be associated with terrorism, we want to make perfectly
clear that we have no recent messages from bin Laden. Well, depending on
what you mean by recent, or messages, or course. We might
be typing words that bin
Laden might type, or words
that someone associated with bin Laden might type.
But we are not computer savvy. Oh, no. Don't even think it. We
hardly know what these computer thingies are. We think there are
tiny men and women (and maybe oxen and ocelots) inside whose sole aim is
to infuriate us. That's true, isn't it?
And as to those markers,
those code words ... uh
... we didn't put them here. We don't know who did. Um, we don't think
there are any here. None at all. Are there?
Plurp. Have you played Operation
Dark Screen? Oh, it's not a game? Then maybe you'd be interested in
Millennium
Challenge 2002.
The Army will use this experiment
to test the following hypothesis: IF Ground Component and Joint Force Commanders
are provided an Interim ARFOR that employs advanced enablers across the
DTLOMS, THEN they will realize significant advances in their ability to
seize the initiative, maintain momentum, and exploit success.
Sounds swell, doesn't it?
Yo.
And while we're having fun, let's look at how
the U.S. Army plans to change over the next few years. It's actually
an interesting read, both in terms of the threats they see the future presenting
to us, and the increasingly horrifying and deadly capabilities that they
have.
Yow. Now this is funny.
Plurp.
The blue dog
was disturbed by all this talk
about grisly forms of death
Tuesday, July 23, 2002
Blab. A reader is very disturbed. (This should come
as no surprise.)
Dear God No
'Another tarn was lame'
Do you have ANY idea how BIG a tarn
is?
And how many feet it has? And how
many would have to have something wrong for it to 'go lame'.
Oh ...wait a minute... tarm?
Well maybe..
And if you've never seen a garway when it's ritig ... well it's quite a
sight, of that you can be sure. Best to keep your umbrella handy.
Blab. A reader shares one of the simple pleasures of life.
Thanks
Captain Plurp for the connection to the
Monty Python site. What a delicious luxury to have whole scripts of
some of the best scenes ever: "Bring me a shrubbery!"; "He's not dead,
he's, he's restin'!"; and "What also floats in water?" ... "Very small
rocks!" The best!
Your Midwest Correspondent
Who lives where some people really
are Lumberjacks
And they're OK.
Blab. A reader attempts to insult us. Let's see if it works.
>We laid awake for hours...
>Now, this morning, we can't remember
In case you haven't noticed the pattern
there is a failure mode common to all who enter the later stages of their
dorian greyness...
if you think of something to do and
do not do it immediately you will set the "done" bit (without actually
doing it) and purge it from memory forever. Don't dream about work. Live
in the moment. Urinate when the urge strikes else you'll end up wearing
diapers.
there is no door...
the laughing monk
We forever urinate on the memory of our failing reader, then set the "forget"
bit, and laugh.
Blab. A Treasured Reader brings us good ideas, which are usually
in quite scarce supply around these parts.
Presuming that you are one
of the enlightened and therefore use an IBM ThinkPad of some description,
we suggest that you install some flavour of GNU/Linux on it. Then if the
code is buggy, at least you can fix it. I'm the proud owner of a TP600e
(yes - I know it's old - but it works) and it runs Mandrake Linux version
8.2, and very nice it is too. Never had it crash on me yet. -AJL
It is a glorious suggestion, and we would love to take you up on it. We
fear, however, that we are victim of the Insidious Plot of the Evil Empire.
Which is to say, we actually need to run stuff that runs on Windows. Lotus
Notes (Cthulhu save us), Freelance (you've never heard of it), Microsoft
Office (sorry).
We would mention games, but most games don't seem to work on (our demonically
possessed version of) Windows 2000 anyway, so it probably wouldn't be a
big change.
We do miss the Good Old Days, though, when operating systems actually,
you know, stayed up.
Blab. Thinking about the hover help on yesterday's photo of the
giant squid, a reader is ...
Picturing a giant squid wearing
a "Kiss the Cook" apron while barbequeing the psyches of poor humans....
- Felis Lynx
Two things may frighten you here. (1) The caption, The squid would make
a great barbeque, is the caption that CNN
put on the picture. We don't make this stuff up; it turns out we don't
have to. (2) We had exactly that mental image (well, we might have missed
the apron), which is why we put that caption as the hover help.
Plop. Yeah, we know the little HTML pop-up text goodies aren't
called hover help. But what
are
they called?
Plurp. What could be more viscerally horrifying, more mentally
corrosive, more existentially twisted than six
Siamese kittens, all joined together in a most unholy and aberrant
manner, mewling and writhing, eyes shut tight, unable to understand which
misshapen paw is moved and by whom?
Ox
tongue ice cream, that's what. (Megnut,
/usr/bin/girl)
Yow.
Australian producer Helen
Bowden has just returned from the Sundance Festival, where the provocative
and stylish short film Shooting The Breeze, directed by Christina
Andreef, was screened to a very positive response.
Congrats all around!
Yo. Now we know where little Tommy Ridge gets the
text of his terror warnings. (Bifurcated
Rivets)
Yo. How to make a thought
screen helmet. Useful for reducing those alien thought control beams.
(Bifurcated
Rivets)
Plop. Is there something about being in a religious hierarchy
that rots the brain? Some secret mind-liquifying technology to which the
religious must subject themselves in order to be elevated to leadership
positions?
First, the Catholic church attempts to distract attention from its institutional
pedophilia. Now, their splinter brethren at the Church
of England jump in it with both feet.
Dr Williams, who is now Archbishop
of Wales, [...] launches a blistering attack in The Times on the
corruption and premature sexualisation of children by a consumer society,
singling out the Disney Corporation, talent shows and computer games for
particular criticism.
While
we are not at all sure that infant beauty contests deserve this kind of
rabid excoriation, we are at least pleased to see religious leaders paying
attention to the two most pressing moral problems of our age: the Disney
Corporation and computer games.
Plurp.
The blue dog
accidentally ran through that religious
mind-liquifying technology
Monday, July 22, 2002
Blab. A reader interprets our
silliness as criticism.
Sorry if I came across as
rude.
Anyway, I've decided to be self-employed
and work on my world domination plans. (Solo, for now, until I can afford
to hire other people. This could be quite some time.)
The book I spoke of has decided that
it _demands_ to be written, so I shall be busy with that until Christmas
or so, I imagine.
I'll probably foist a copy on your
colleague, Mr. Chess, and maybe he'll let you look at it. And maybe, just
maybe, you might find it interesting or worth your time.
- the zyx lady
Not at all! We look forward to the results of your literary efforts, and
to playing the role of foolish blog owner in your global empire.
More generally, we encourage our readers not to take us seriously. Criminey.
It's just a blog.
Blab. On our curious break from form yesterday,
a reader asks:
Why?
What sort of answer would satisfy you? Would it make you happy if we told
you about a cerebral hemorrhage? A weekend of clandestine interrogation,
tied to a splintery chair in a stereotypically abandoned warehouse, hallucinogenic
drugs forced into our veins? A mysterious woman in a burgundy suit who
offered us several million dollars to perform acts that we dare not confess
here?
Or is it possible, just barely possible, that your universe, as well
as ours, is capable of random and inexplicable events, not just yesterday,
and not just by us, but all the time, and by everyone and everything you
think you have ever known?
Mmm?
Blab. A newsy reader writes:
but wait! There's
MORE!
Ah yes. The case of the Pakistani woman.
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan, Friday,
July 12 — The public gang rape of a woman in Punjab province appears to
have begun with another crime: three higher-caste tribesman sodomized her
11-year-old brother, then tried to cover up what they had done, an investigation
shows.
The boy had even been locked up in
a cell by the police to prevent him from reporting on the three men, according
to an investigation from the province's governor, Lt. Gen. Khalid Maqbool.
Even more here.
Faithful readers will recall that
the poor woman was gang-raped as punishment for some alleged sexual transgression
of her other brother. We are fascinated with the historical derivation
of this school of jurisprudence.
Blab. A Treasured Reader sends us a visually impaired link.
weeding
out
Unfortunately, our reader gets the link wrong, forcing us to do work to
find the correct one. We hate that. Anyhow, the correct link is to a story
about American TV confrontation show icon Jerry
Springer getting sued, for allegedly contributing to the murder of
a guest. Or something like that.
During the episode, titled
called "Secret Mistresses Confronted," Campbell-Panitz discovered her ex-hubby
had secretly wed another woman in March of 2000, and that the newlyweds
wanted Campbell-Panitz out of their lives. The show concluded with Campbell-Panitz
being ridiculed by her ex's new wife and heckled by the audience as she
left the stage.
Although Campbell-Panitz and Ralf
Panitz divorced in 1999, she reportedly still lived with her former husband--even
after he remarried. He allegedly split his time between the two women,
and all three traded accusations of domestic violence among them.
Prosecutors said that, two months
after the taping, Ralf Panitz watched the episode at a bar, stormed off
to Campbell-Panitz's residence and--angry that she had since demanded he
remove his belongings from her home--flew into a drunken rage and killed
her.
We interpret our reader's comment as suggesting that this is Darwin In
Action. We're glad someone else said that.
Blab. A reader suggests that we ...
Gotta
love the rich
It seems that well-known New York publicist Lizzie Grubman, the same Lizzie
Grubman who ran over folks
a while ago in her SUV, staged a weepy, sobby display all the way from
the courtroom to (yes) her SUV. According to the article, it was a transparent
sympathy ploy after her plea negotiations were unsuccessful. But we think
Lizzie really meant it.
We do. Surely we do.
Blab. Mistaking us for a travel site, a reader reveals its evil
intent to infiltrate our secret hideaway.
I'll be going to Cooper Island
for the first time in Nov. I'll be staying at the Beach Club but
I would like to "explore" the other beaches on the island. In your
"trip report" you mention a path to the beach house. My partner wears
a leg brace and uses a cane. I would like to know 1. how rocky
the path is between the Beach Club and the house 2. how rocky
would the walk on the beach between the Club and the house be and 3. from
what I've read, the beach house and the hill house have a "private" beach
- does that mean that others shouldn't use that beach??
I'm hoping that you will answer the
above questions.
Well ...
-
Pretty rocky, actually. Most of it was once intended to be a gravel road,
of sorts, but various parts of it have eroded away - some quite precipitously
- various thorny plants have grown, and a piece of it was always scrambly
boulders anyway, and ... well, your partner will have a tough time. We
wouldn't count on it.
-
There's no beach-only path from the Beach Club to the house. See (1).
-
The beach in front of the house is private. Technically, the law allows
folks to tramp up to the high tide line, but it's kinda rude. We like to
see folks respect the privacy of people who go there for privacy.
And don't forget the sunscreen!
Blab. A reader brings us sad news.
I recall you being interested
in the BBC News story that "Lost Monty Python Sketches [were] to be Performed."
According to Ananova
this morning, this is sadly not to be the case.
--Gutted, UK.
Bummer! Yes, we were interested. But
according to a spokesman for the Graham Chapman Archive, there was:
"concern that the sketches
could not possibly live up to the vast amount of interest that has already
been generated about them."
Let's see. He said they sucked, right? Oh well.
Blab. A reader announces ...
The
Larch
Look at that. The entire Monty Python collection, now on DVD. Isn't technology
wonderful? And speaking of the
larch, you can listen to the song here.
Isn't the Web wonderful? Isn't everything wonderful?
Blab. A reader sends us a puzzle.
www.evhead.com
www.kottke.org
www.megnut.com
www.onfocus.com
a.wholelottanothing.org
Beets
Which of these does not belong? And
why?
Blab. A reader spends an otherwise busy, productive Monday on
the following kind of useless neural buzzing. Just like us.
random walk thoughts under
the idea lamppost:
IBM announced that DB2 is an example
of self-healing technology. When started the DB2 daemon autoinstalls linux
and restarts.
If the blue dog self-heels will it
ever move again? Sounds like the famous koan: What is the sound of one
hand clapping? (which has a trivial but enlightening answer involving teenage
boys and their favorite pastime).
Do you think that koans are really
ancient helenisms that have lost their context?
t
We think that koans are ancient Japanese Helenisms
that did not survive the translation to English. We think that Zen monks
laugh as soon as the door is closed.
Blab. A reader disputes some other reader.
"And stop blaming Micro$oft.
They don't make hardware..."
Funny, I was shopping for a new mouse
(computer, not organism) this weekend, and several of the mice I saw for
sale were labelled "Microsoft." It seems to me there are three possibilities:
a) Some company other than Microsoft
is engaging in trademark infringement
b) A mouse is not considered "hardware"
c) The reader who provided the quote
above is in error.
We leap to (one of) our reader's defense! Yes, Microsoft makes hardware.
They make mice, Xbox
thingies, and other stuff.
But no, we weren't using any of that Microsoft hardware when our laptop
crashed the other day.
It was, howmsoever, that trillion-lines-o-buggy-code OS of Microsoft's
that was running on our laptop when it crashed. Grr.
Plurp.
Upon the blarmey slage and
gumbel
The ritig garway came.
Between the trine and chinnled thimble
Another tarm was lame.
Yo. It turns out that the Brando movie could just as easily have
been called A
Streetcar Named Urquhardt. Weird, eh?
Plurp. The readership
of our silly Web site seems to be slowly rising. No accounting for
taste, we suppose.
Yow. Speaking of increasing readership, this picture of what
seems to be is sure to help!

Scientists in Australia are
investigating what may be a new species of giant squid, after one of the
deep sea creatures washed up on a Tasmanian beach over the weekend.
The squid weighs up to 250 kilograms
and, including tentacles, measured almost 18 meters (60 feet).
Tasmania! It sounds so ... foreign, so ... exotic, so ... Lovecraftian.
Plop. We laid awake for hours in the middle of the night last
night, vexing about all the stuff we had to do at work, making mental lists
of conversations to have, notes to send, and meetings to set up. We slept
like, well, like effluent.
Now, this morning, we can't remember any of those things that we desperately
needed to do.
Plurp.
The blue dog
was an ancient Japanese Helenism
that did not belong
Sunday, July 21, 2002
Plurp.
Today, I will not conform
to form; I will not meet expectations; I will not be what you think I am.
I will only type, pausing occasionally to think of what to type next, and
perhaps describe self-consciously the process of typing. I will type words,
and you expect words, but not these words. The words will form sentences,
and words expect to form sentences, but not these sentences. Thoughts will
swarm, noisily, using my head as their hive. Today, I will sleep late.
Today, I will not make sense. Today, things will come in threes.
 |