Current
Earlier
Later
Archive
 

Home
Search
Mail
Stuff
 


Type ...
Bigger!
Permanent URL for this week

2001.09.09 : 2001.09.15

Permanent URL for this entry
Saturday, September 15, 2001
Blab. Ensuring that we will never live down our irreverent foolishness, a reader suggests:
Since you can't sell WTC rubble on eBay, here's another way  to make your fortune.
Hmm!
Nearly 12 tonnes of gold appears to be buried under mountains of debris from New York City's destroyed twin towers. [...]

The bars, worth about $106 million, were stored in an underground warehouse near the World Trade Center and held on behalf of the COMEX metals trading division of the New York Mercantile Exchange.

We're trying to find our prospecting pan now.

Plurp. Yet another day. Yet another Day After. American flags are flying in greater number than we've seen since the Fourth of July when we were kids. (And that was, we must point out, a long, long time ago.)

Bush is preparing the country for war. People seem to support the idea, spouting patriotic and often hormonal slogans. But it reminds us of the scene in Gone With the Wind when the Southern gentlemen shout that they are all set to go to war and wup those Yankees. 

MAN: We'll finish them in one battle. Gentlemen can always fight better than rattle.

[...]

RHETT BUTLER : I think it's hard winning a war with words, gentlemen.

[...]

MAN: What difference does that make, sir, to a gentleman?

RHETT: I'm afraid it's going to make a great deal of difference to a great many gentlemen, sir.

Today we seem to be playing Rhett Butler's part. Not that we are lobbying against military action; it's not clear to us what else can be done. But we are here to warn you not to think it will be glorious, or simple, or distant. The U.S. has not fought a war on its own soil since the Civil War, and that was before there were weapons of any significance.

Make no mistake. If this is war, we will not watch it only on our TVs, as we have every war in our lifetime. We will not ride over the enemy as if it were sleeping, as the U.S. did Iraq in the Gulf War. This will be a war that the enemy brings home to us just as much as we bring it to them. It will be a war in which U.S. civilians will die - schoolteachers, clergy, cooks, children - horribly and in large number.

It will be a lengthy war. It will be a costly war, both in lives and economically. It will be a war that redefines how we think about the U.S., and not altogether in a positive way.

It may be a necessary war. But it will still be war. And war, as we are about to rediscover, really is hell.

Plop. In other news, bastions of American tolerance and understanding Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson check in with this colorful rant, according to the Washington Post.

Television evangelists Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, two of the most prominent voices of the religious right, said liberal civil liberties groups, feminists, homosexuals and abortion rights supporters bear partial responsibility for Tuesday's terrorist attacks because their actions have turned God's anger against America.

[...]

Then Falwell broadened his blast to include the federal courts and others who he said were "throwing God out of the public square." He added: "The abortionists have got to bear some burden for this because God will not be mocked. And when we destroy 40 million little innocent babies, we make God mad. I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People for the American Way -- all of them who have tried to secularize America -- I point the finger in their face and say, 'You helped this happen.' "

Naturally, Jerry says he didn't say that. Well, sorta.
Despite the impression some may have from news reports today, I hold no one other than the terrorists and the people and nations who have enabled and harbored them responsible for Tuesday's attacks on this nation.

I sincerely regret that comments I made during a long theological discussion on a Christian television program yesterday were taken out of their context and reported, and that my thoughts--reduced to sound bites--have detracted from the spirit of this day of mourning.

Anyway, it's sure a good thing we don't have anyone this dim actually running the government.

And when the wars were over, no one ever knew what they were aboutPlurp.

The blue dog
thought that
most of the miseries of the world
were caused by wars


Permanent URL for this entry
Friday, September 14, 2001

Blab. A knowledgeable reader tells us:
Things never were normal where the blue dog is concerned.
We wonder if things were ever really normal anywhere.

Blab. Mistaking our usual foolishness for seriousness, a reader writes to reassure us:

It's not just 'G' and 'the meme-mixer' who're pleased to hear or yours and Helen's well-being. We are too. Keep up the good work!
Thank you and, of course, we both realize that and appreciate it.

Blab. A reader writes:

I'm not the selfish type. I "feel" for everybody on the East coast that's in the middle of this ordeal. But, being on the West coast, we're too far away to actually comprehend the depth of THIS. But, my selfishness is this: I was supposed to fly out to Reno from Portland on 9/23 for my first anniversary. I've never flown and this hasn't made it any better. Do I fly down there or stay at home? It's hard to tell what to do. Ack! Forgive me for my selfishness - My "irritation" is minor compared to what's going on - but I suppose it's a coping method. I don't want to focus on what's REALLY going on. Let me live in my "it can't happen here" world and allow me bury my head in the sand. It's safer there.
The notion that anyone would actually take advice from Plurp is too bizarre to consider. So instead, we'll simply say that this is exactly the point of terrorism - to make you afraid in the everyday things that you do, to make you fear where you live, where you work, where you walk and where you fly.

We would hardly be human if this week's terrible events didn't give us pause. But if we cower under our beds and hope nothing will happen to us then, well, something has happened to us, and the terrorists have won.

Plurp. More somber today, morose even. Tense. There is almost no telling, from our apartment, that anything at all has happened.  We can't see the Twin Towers from where we are. Or couldn't; there are large buildings in the way.

But we could, night before last, smell the burning odor, even though we are four miles away. It was faint, and smelled of burning paper. But, even so, you knew what it was.

They evacuated Penn Central Station and the Empire State Building that night due to bomb threats. There were ninety (yes, 90) more bomb threats yesterday, all bogus. It reminds us of the early 1970s, when bomb threats on college campuses were so frequent that we ended up just ignoring them. And yet ...

On the way to work yesterday, a nondescript truck passes, going the other way, surrounded by black unmarked cars with flashing red lights. Then, a few miles later, a long line of yellow dump trucks, maybe twenty or thirty of them. Where are they going? Oh.

It is the heightened awareness of paranoia. What is the meaning of that? Why are those here? No event is trivial or unconnected. There are warnings in the wind.

Yo. Interesting near-real-time news feeds on underreported events related to the terrorist incident can be found at Fox News (click on Fox News Alerts: Check Here for the Latest - it was working yesterday morning but not yesterday afternoon) and on the main page of Stratfor (scroll down to where it says Situation Reports).

Plop. Some few people of limited moral and mental capacity (sorry - differently brained) are attacking people of Middle Eastern extraction in the U.S. They shoot out the windows of a mosque. One brandishes a shotgun at some random guy. Another threatens neighborhood shop owners who are, in fact, Americans.

Could these colorful folks please just tie themselves to fence posts until we have time to pick them up? Thanks very.

Yo. An intriguing analysis of Bush's options after the terrorist attack concludes this.

[...] Washington may well be headed for a third option. Declaring a "war" on fundamentalist militants both avoids the problems of naming a specific national sponsor and allows Washington a broader mandate to tackle current and potential threats to the United States. And, similar to the "war on drugs," the war on terrorism would enlist the help of nations around the globe -- when convenient for U.S. policy interests. 

Such a global war on potential threats would require the substantial involvement of U.S. intelligence agencies and Special Forces in defining foreign policy initiatives. During the Cold War, clandestine operations and support of democratically questionable regimes were tolerated in the interest of blocking the spread of Communism. Now, similar actions may well become more common against the widespread threat from extremists.

The threat of fundamentalism is global, stretching well beyond the Middle East through Africa, Central Asia and East Asia. It is expanding into Eastern Europe and Russia and may well take root on a smaller scope in South and North America. This gives Washington both a boundless battlefield and a wide range of potential allies. Countries like the Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia -- where Islamic militancy is rising -- will become more important to U.S. policymakers. Relations with Russia and India will also expand because both are combating Islamic militancy and possess necessary local intelligence assets. 

This will not be a quick war nor one with a definite end point. Washington must be willing to accept greater influence in policy from intelligence agencies -- whose lapses may have allowed the latest attacks -- and from Special Operations forces, whose clandestine operations may not fit with current accepted norms. Further, the American people must be steeled against counter-strikes on U.S. soil. Given the limited choices available to counter future threats of terrorism against domestic targets, however, Washington will inevitably shift its counter-terrorism strategies to a more global -- and unconventional -- posture. 

Watch for Washington getting people used to this idea in the coming days and weeks.

Even that didn't helpPlurp.

The blue dog
tried being irreverent,
inappropriate
and downright tasteless


Permanent URL for this entry
Thursday, September 13, 2001

Plurp. Those of you who don't want to hear more about the terrorist incident, or who don't want to deal with it by indulging in irreverent, inappropriate and downright tasteless humor, shouldn't read Plurp today (or maybe for a while). We all deal with stress in our own way. 

Blab. A kind reader writes:

Our thoughts are with you. Glad you're OK. G
Thanks, G. You are apparently one of two people in the world who feel that way.

Blab. The other kind reader writes:

Glad to hear you and Helen are OK. -- the meme-mixer
Thanks, but we don't understand in what way that mixes the ... oh!

Rare photoBlab. Covering our eyes and thrusting our naked hand into the shoebox that contains our pre-disaster Blabs, we find this pair of probing questions.

Why are all your photos of the Unnamable One in the napping mode only? Doesn't he DO anything else all day?
Our photos represent a random sample of the activities of Him Without Name. In the rare moment when he's not sleeping, he is either ingesting, excreting or annoying. Or some combination thereof.

Blab. On the subject of pubically twitting our dear readers, a dear reader writes:

Please tell me "pubically" was a mistake.
You would have to take that up with the anonymous reader who proposed it.

Blab. Another reader writes:

hate when I miss the joke.
Don't worry. It's been pretty unfunny around here recently.

Blab. A scary reader writes:

Eeeek!
Scary Babies, though perhaps scary for reasons other than originally intended.

Blab. An argumentative reader writes:

I'd argue that this WASN'T the first Plurp Scavenger Hunt, that you challenged readers to find the first entry that mixed memes.
You may recall that our readers didn't rise to that particular challenge. (We have great and wonderful readers, but they are as lazy as we are.) So we're giving them another chance, and one that might also be easier.

Dear readers, show those naughty terrorists that we will not be distracted from the higher purposes in life. Tell us what you do and don't like about Plurp (in honor of Plurp's first anniversary), then try your fingers at the First Plurp Scavenger Hunt.

Oh, go do it. You know you want to. Tell yourself it's a break from stressing out. Then you won't feel so guilty.

Blab. On the topic of Helen's own blog, a knowledgeable reader writes:

Helen is too busy taking care of Steve (and mending her back) to establish a blog though she appreciates your encouragement......send her money for a maid and she will consider it.......
Big donations (or small maids) may be entered into the Big Blab Box.

Plurp. Speaking of small maids, imagine being the person who has to dust everything in lower Manhattan.

Yo. An astonishing photoessay on the World Trade Center disaster from Time by award-winning photojournalist James Nachtwey. Simply unbelievable.

Plurp. Looks like our clever plan of swiping a wheelbarrow full of World Trade Center wreckage to sell piece by piece on eBay won't work. Fooey.

Yo. A correspondent points us at some interesting technical information about the construction of the World Trade Center towers and how they are likely to have behaved when crashed into and subjected to high heat.

Our correspondent also reminds us not to forget Red Rock Eater's Digest, which usually has very good links.

Yo. We figured any doofus who practiced with Microsoft Flight Simulator could have flown those airliners into big buildings like the World Trade Center. Not so, says somebody who probably knows, they had to be pilots experienced with large commercial planes. Interesting. (rebecca)

Yo. Two good sources of information on terrorism and military stuff: Jane's and Stratfor. (rebecca)

Yo. Satellite imagery of the Pentagon and the former World Trade Center site, post-kaboom. (Click to, um, enlarge.)

Five Minus two

Rant. Some TV news commentator keeps saying This is the biggest terrorist incident in recorded history. Like - what - there was some awful event in the Stone Age in which Og killed everyone in Mesopotamia? Or some unrecorded Jurassic event in which a Tyrannosaurus got rabies and went on a rampage?

Sheesh.

Yow. They may blow up our city but they can't stop Helen.

    You're a cheap thrill
    • You're a cheap date
    • It's a cheap thrill

They're not, you knowPlurp.

The blue dog
didn't think things were
back to normal


Permanent URL for this entry
Wednesday, September 12, 2001

Plurp. It's hard to know what to say. It's hard to know what to think.

Yesterday morning, I was getting ready to go to work when the usually silly morning TV was interrupted by a live feed of the World Trade Center on fire. What a mess, I said. I'd better get out of here before the traffic gets completely tied up. 

Um, said Helen, pointing at the screen, that's not just a fire. She pointed at the hole in the World Trade Center that, Wile-E-Coyote-like, was a central circle flanked by two long slits. That was an airplane, she said. This is a terrorist attack. Looking at the video, it was obvious that she was right. Little did we suspect that it was just the beginning.

As I drove north out of the City, I heard about the attack on the second World Trade Center tower, then on the Pentagon. If it had been possible to turn around and get Helen at that point, I certainly would have. But southbound traffic had already ground to a halt.

I tried to call Helen when I got to work. New York from spaceAll of the lines were busy. So I IMed her and she told me about the collapse of the first World Trade Center tower. Unbelievable. I headed down to a conference room with a live news feed just in time to see the second tower collapse, covering the lower third of the island in choking dust and debris.

I didn't get much done yesterday, well not in terms of regular work. I stayed plugged into every news feed I could find, wondering what else might happen. (As if what had already happened wasn't enough for one lifetime.) For most of the day, I was just in a very heightened state of awareness, taking in everything I could. It was only later in the afternoon that I felt exhaustion setting in as my arms began to shake.

I stayed north of the lab with friends last night, there not seeming to be any way to get back into the City yet. Helen, despite my pleas, walked across the City to her cousin's apartment, where she stayed the night. We're home now, and Midtown Manhattan seems eerily unchanged.

We're lucky. Nothing happened to us. We were with friends. And we're fine. There are a lot of people - a lot of people - who aren't fine tonight. We've heard from a number of our friends in Manhattan who are OK. There are friends about whom we haven't heard.

I think this particular incident is over now, though the upcoming body count will shock nearly everyone. And I have ongoing concerns about disease arising from the World Trade Center site in the next few days; I hope I'm wrong about that.

My larger concern, though, is what happens next. Bush will inevitably find someone to blame and drop lots of bombs. But what else? I fear that everyone who has been riding the horses of increasing power to intelligence agencies (both internationally and domestically, both in surveillance and extra-judicial action) will gallop to the fore and be given nearly unlimited budget and license. Some wag on TV said we woke up in a very different country today.

And, in spite of yesterday's horrors, I fear that even more.


Permanent URL for this entry
Tuesday, September 11, 2001

Plurp. Update. Wouldn't you know it? What would have been a happy day here at Plurp coincides with the worst terrorist attack in American history. Helen and I were in our apartment when the first plane hit the World Trade Center. I was on my way out of the City when the second one hit, and at work when both towers collapsed. What a mess. And, as of 11:30 AM EDT, it's still not over.

I'm OK. Helen is OK. Or, as OK as can be expected.

Please understand that the rest of today's Plurp was posted shortly after midnight last night, before this disaster occurred.

Blab. A loyal reader writes:

Happy Birthday Plurp.  For, dear readers, the anniversary of which Steve has been writing is Plurp's first birthday.  How could any loyal Plurp reader fail to know this?  Sheesh!
Why, thank you! Read on.

Plurp. Indeed it is the first anniversary of Plurp. (Well, depending on what you count.) We've been doing this stupid blog stuff for 365 consecutive days now! It's almost beyond belief.

So what have we learned from a whole year of Plurping? We're not sure. We started this whole thing as a bit of an experiment.

You should do it, said Dave, as a sanity project. Dave has always had sanity projects - something that he does other than Real Work, just for fun, just to keep him sane. You know Dave.

It's very ... white! said Ian, seeing a prototype of Plurp. He was right.

Now, 365 days later, we've written the frightening equivalent of a one thousand page novel. (Yes, we did the math.) We've gone from it being difficult to think of anything to say to it being difficult to shut up. (This is also the story of our life.) 

We've met (metaphorically, at least) a number of people: interesting people, colorful people, and really very odd people. (You may, if you wish, guess into which category you fall.) We've come to care about who they are (though often we don't really know) and what's going on in their lives.

It's been a difficult year, in many ways. Plurp certainly has helped to keep us sane (to the extent that we ever were). We have become obsessed with blogging. That's not surprising - we become obsessed with lots of stuff. That, too, helps keep us sane. But we have sometimes neglected friends, and family, in our pursuit of daily bloggery. We have spent time blogging that might have been better spent in other pursuits. Or maybe not.

All in all, it has been interesting. In a sense, we have done this for our own sake. But, in at least equal measure, we have done it for yours - for the imagined pleasure of your reactions, even when you don't tell us what they are; for the thrill of well-crafted phrases that might delight you; for the fun of just being silly with you.

So, thank you. Thank you for reading this drivel. Thank you for sometimes Blabbing at us. Thank you for helping to keep us sane. It's a very strange relationship we have, you and we. But we like it. We like it a lot.

Yow. In honor of the first anniversary of Plurp, we have two special treats for you. First, we give you a chance to tell us what you like and don't like about Plurp. This is your opportunity to encourage us in one direction or another, so please do. Especially you folks who seldom Blab at us! Think of this as you would going to church on Easter - you only have to do it once a year, after all.

Ready? Here goes.

What do you like most about Plurp?

What do you like least? (Brutal honesty is encouraged.)

Permanent link to this entry

Plurp. Our second treat for the First Anniversary of Plurp is the First Plurp Scavenger Hunt. In this hunt, you will have the opportunity to regurgitate trivial and useless facts that you can dig up by searching the Plurp archives or (more worrying still) by knowing them already.

Type in your answer below each question. Some are easy; some are not. Answer as many as you can and mash the Send! button at the bottom of this entry. Remember, the more questions you answer correctly the more we worry about you, so give it your best!
 

First Plurp Scavenger Hunt

When was Plurp first posted? (Hint: Be careful.)

When did the Blab box make its first appearance? How about the Big Blab Box?

When was the first edition of Plurp that used a title other than Plurp: A Weblog?

When did Captain Plurp first make an appearance?

When did the blue dog first appear in Plurp?

What is the blue dog's gender? How do you know?

What is a Helenism?

What is a broken joke?

What does  mean?

What is our cat's name?

Who is Our Greatest Fan?

Who is Mia?

Who is Roger the Chicken?

Who can sing the alphabet backwards?

Please identify yourself in one way or another so we can credit your brilliant answers to you. If you're shy, use a pseudonym.

And thanks for playing!

Not my jobPlurp.

The blue dog
didn't
know any of the
answers


Permanent URL for this entry
Monday, September 10, 2001

Blab. A reader who might have a cat (or vice versa) writes:
More Things That Surprise My Cat Every Day:
  1. The sliding glass door is only open to the balcony when I'm home, and NEVER at night.
  2. Why do I insist on brushing her when the carpet does a fine job of removing excess hair?
  3. I eat very strange foods that aren't nearly as appetizing as dry kibble.
  4. I feel a compelling need to leave the house every day even though there's a perfectly sunny spot on the carpet to nap upon right there in the apartment.
  5. I waste a lot of time on the computer when I could be napping all evening.
Dreaming of dominanceCats are clearly the dominant form of life on Earth, and they know it. While we have temporarily established an uneasy position of Alpha Male in our household, we know it's only a matter of time before The Unnamable One hatches his plot to take over.

We live in fear.

Blab. Our readers prove that they are always after the Big Questions.

the first person to milk a cow, what did they think they were doing?
We're not positive but it seems likely that, whatever it was, it was considered opprobrious at the time. We can only imagine a group of outraged Stone Age people on the plains of central Africa, huddled outside their grass huts, gaping in horror at one of their number. You did what?!

Blab. Curious about yesterday's cryptic reader reference to an anniversary, a reader writes:

Anniversary of what, a bobbled election?  The Market Crash of '87? The fall of Poland in WWII?
No, no. Much bigger than that. You'll see tomorrow.

Blab. Somehow we have been caught in the middle of a duct tape vortex.

Dear Captain Plurp,

More submissions from last week's party:

She used duct tape
To tape her show
The VCR's now dead 
You know.

*************

Andy came to Clare's defense, her
Car now has a tape dispenser.

Duct tape:  The Handyman's Secret Weapon

*************

When Grandma showed up 
In the nude
Grandpa really
Came unglued.
He needed duct tape! 

The Handyman's Secret Weapon

*************
- Your Midwest Correspondent

Assuming that Burma Shave has no active patents on those road signs, we a see a big career for our Midwest Correspondent with 3M Corp. Or someplace.

Blab. A group of non-bloggers writes, collectively:

We love Helen.  We have great great respect and admiration for Helen (although we don't hear/know much about her except for that great story about how you two got together, eventually). (Yes, we know more, but it seems fleeting right now)  We await anxiously the Helen blog, but we know it is possible that she, like us, feels that there are competing demands on our time and energy.  Even though there are men in our lives who are obsessed with blogging, we resist.
Helen is, of course, free to use Plurp as a surrogate blog, as many of our readers do. As is already well established, we feel no competing demands on our time and energy.

Blab. A reader attempts to resolve our social problems while increasing our vocabulary.

"Is there possibly anything I can do to be embraced by Steve's Circle of Friends again?"

Why, be pubically twitted on Plurp, of course. (Oh, you already were!  So what's the problem?)

Surely you don't suggest that we ridicule our kind and generous readers? That would be rude, wouldn't it?

Blab. A reader with certain tendencies writes:

Slap her down. She's starting to irritate me.
Whether this is directed towards ~Sara or Helen, we think this sort of nasty display is completely unwarranted, and all too typical of the trend towards easy violence that seems to permeate modern American society.

Blab. On this same topic, an embittered reader writes:

I don't think you need to take any action responding to ~Sara or whomever seems to be bitter.  Stick to what has brought you all your loyal readers rather than cowering to the one or two narrow-minded thinkers who don't see the true greatness of Plurp.  Well, I admit I don't see the true greatness of Plurp, but at least I'm not narrow-minded !

But don't change a thing !  Changing based on the whims of the one or two loud voices is like a politician who, well, it's like a politician.

We don't see any greatness whatsoever in Plurp, know we're narrow-minded, and don't like any politicians. But be that as it may, we've decided we should be nicer to our dear readers, or at least less obscure. So we'll be trying out niceness (and perhaps even clarity) as a new form of social interaction in the future. Should be exciting!

Maybe ~Sara will even stick around to see how it turns out.

Yak. Helen's review of the movie Hannibal.

Hannibal Lechter, eating his way to the top.

Yow. Time and Google provideth. We found the lyrics to Albert the Genius, which we were unable to find last year.

Albert dance around, Albert be profound 
Albert let your hair stick out and your socks hang down 
We love the Web.

Plurp. You know the old joke which asks what a Jewish-American Princess makes for dinner and the answer is reservations? Question: What does Steve make for dinner? Answer: Phone calls.

Yak.

It looks like there's going to be a run-off in the Democratic election.

I think they should all run off.

Yo. Google thinks that these sites (mostly blogs) are similar to Plurp in some as yet unspecified way. Mayhaps we should examine them, in hopes that there are interesting blogs to read there.

Yo. Dave leads us to an article on Exploding Head Syndrome. (We don't cite his original link because it makes our browser explode. Really.)

Boom

It's an occupational hazardPlurp.

The blue dog
was obsessed
with blogging


Permanent URL for this entry
Sunday, September 9, 2001

Blab. We clearly need help from our readers in responding to this.
Are you mocking me? I feel a little mocked right now and I don't like it one bit.

I've told my colleagues about your fascinating website. I'm a PROMOTER for pete's sake!

Is there possibly anything I can do to be embraced by Steve's Circle of Friends again? I eagerly await your next posting.

Now, this might be ~Sara of recent Plurp fame. Readers may recall that we responded to a contribution of hers on cloning in our usual idiom, suggesting that federal laws be passed requiring a degree in biology of anyone who wrote about cloning. ~Sara, or someone else, took us seriously (a response to which we are not accustomed) and took offense. We offered abject and florid apologies, of a kind as would have turned the interest of most any young woman in our misspent youth.

We have clearly reached the degenerate point in our life where we are unable to make simple conversation with perfectly reasonable people. We solicit advise from our wiser readers as to how we can proceed.

Blab. A reader with an interest in singing squirrels writes:

http://www.threebrain.com/weeeeee.html
http://www.threebrain.com/songs/hypo.html
It's not often that we come across a rock video featuring a squirrel, whose chorus is Gonads and Strife. That is unique. And well worth the twenty-five cents.

We also don't recall a previous rock video on the subject of hypothermia. So that's special too.

(Because these little gems employ certain, erm, adult themes, we have followed our usual practice of requiring you to do the cut-and-paste thing instead of clicking right through. Yeah, we have no idea why we do that either.)

Blab. Helen graces us with an explanation for her prolonged absense.

Helen is home from the Pacific Northwest.  Her mother has successful been moved to a large 2 room apt in an independent living situation.  House of 30 years has been emptied and closed up All excess belongings have been dispersed - some in this direction.  Helen has NOT written any responses to Plurp and cannot be held responsible for any notes emanating from that region........ she hardly had time to scan the weblog.
As you might imagine, this heroic effort involved a great deal of work and emotional fortitude on the part of all of the participants, and we think they deserve a big round of applause.

Blab. Unable to let it go, an obsessive-compulsive reader writes:

Devorticles, devorticles, devorticles, devorticles.

(It scans better than 'devortexes'. A vorticle, of course, is a small vortex. Or something like that.)

Weirdly enough, there are those who agree with you.

Blab. An attentive reader writes:

The anniversary is nearing...
Yes, it is!

Plop. An analog correspondent gives us enough clues to find this.

The Interior Department announced Monday it had conferred national historic landmark status [...] on a California garbage dump that turns out to be full of toxic waste.

"By preserving these unique sites, we share our culture and rich diversity with our children for future generations," Interior Secretary Gale Norton said in a news release naming the toxin-leaking Fresno Sanitary Landfill one of 15 historic landmarks. The landfill took its place beside such well-known landmarks as the White House and the Brooklyn Bridge

Our tax dollars at work.

Plop. Have you seen those weird ads featuring young women distorted so as to have huge heads and finger-like bodies? They are, we seem to think, fashion ads of some kind. Well, lucky you, now you can buy dolls designed from these ads: Fashion Attitude Dolls.

Society's new role modelF.A.D. Fashion Attitude Dolls are hip and on the go. Each doll comes packaged in a collectible case, posed on a displayable doll stand, and wearing an authentic outfit from her brand's most current collection. She is always prepared for all occasions, with additional fashions and a change of shoes. Her shopping bag, in which she carries her accessories, also doubles as a keychain just for you! She stands 9 inches tall, perfect for posing with attitude - fashion attitude, that is!

For fall, nothing says retro chic like roller skates and authentic vintage-style Jordache Jeans. Just ask this F.A.D. girl! Always at the peak of fashion, she looks hot and adventurous in her denim jumper from Jordache's fall 2001 line. Peek into her shopping bag where she's stored a pair of shoes (for when she tires of skating), boy shorts, and a matching cami. Whether she's off for a date or a fantastic night out with the girls, she's turning heads with that style of hers!
This is your daughter on ads. Any questions?

Plurp.

Amalgam
Imagination
Tobin tk

As long as it's blue and furryPlurp.

The blue dog
was a slave
to fashion
Top Earlier entries Later entries

© 2001 Steve R. White, All Rights Reserved